2018
DOI: 10.1002/jib.484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters and morpho-agronomic characterization of barley in the Brazilian Savannah

Abstract: There is a growing demand for malting barley in the world and the supply relies on introducing the crop into new agricultural regions, such as the Brazilian Savannah. This requires selection for high yield and seed quality, critical factors for the success of commercial production. This study aimed at estimating genetic parameters associated with morpho‐agronomic characterization of 433 preliminarily selected accessions from a worldwide barley collection. The accessions were grown on a limed and fertilized Hap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When h 2 was 95.6% (Table 2), the selection of genotypes with lower values should contribute for more adjusted lineage, once lodged plants are not harvested at the field, taking into consideration the considerable loss of productivity. A similar value was observed by Monteiro et al (2018), however other researches have shown a broad sense heritability lower than 53% (Gut et al 2004;Amabile et al, 2015).…”
Section: /8supporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When h 2 was 95.6% (Table 2), the selection of genotypes with lower values should contribute for more adjusted lineage, once lodged plants are not harvested at the field, taking into consideration the considerable loss of productivity. A similar value was observed by Monteiro et al (2018), however other researches have shown a broad sense heritability lower than 53% (Gut et al 2004;Amabile et al, 2015).…”
Section: /8supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Values of such magnitude were also reported by Fox (2008), who found out h 2 ranging from 89 to 99% and Amabile et al (2015) who reported a value of 96.67%. Ajith (2009) and Monteiro et al (2018) described values for h 2 superior to 80%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations