1999
DOI: 10.2307/3580136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Monitoring of the Human Population from High-Level Natural Radiation Areas of Kerala on the Southwest Coast of India. II. Incidence of Numerical and Structural Chromosomal Aberrations in the Lymphocytes of Newborns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reflected in the dicentric frequency which is significantly raised in comparison with the partner group of comparable age and the offspring group. Studies involving a wide age range have generally shown that frequencies of dicentrics increase with age [34][35][36][37] and, although the difference between the partner group and the offspring group did not reach statistical significance, there is a suggestion of a similar effect in the present study. Studies that have examined acentric frequencies in relation to age have reported both increases [36,37] and no effect [34], with the present study revealing a significant increase in acentrics in the partner group compared with the offspring group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…This is reflected in the dicentric frequency which is significantly raised in comparison with the partner group of comparable age and the offspring group. Studies involving a wide age range have generally shown that frequencies of dicentrics increase with age [34][35][36][37] and, although the difference between the partner group and the offspring group did not reach statistical significance, there is a suggestion of a similar effect in the present study. Studies that have examined acentric frequencies in relation to age have reported both increases [36,37] and no effect [34], with the present study revealing a significant increase in acentrics in the partner group compared with the offspring group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…Extensive epidemiological surveys on populations living in Kerala, India [79,80,81], Iran [82], China [83] and the USA [84,85] have been presented in the literature. In one of the most studied areas, Kerala, no detectable increases have been identified in total death rates or the frequency of chromosomal aberrations or congenital malformations.…”
Section: Indications For Beneficial Effects Of Higher Natural Backgromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historic dosimetry and small sample size especially from the control area were some of the weaknesses of the mitochondrial DNA study-the risk of mutation in HLNR area relative to control area, as estimated from the data was 7.39 with a very wide 95 % CI of 1.003 to 54.5, reflecting lack of precision in the estimate. Our studies on biological and health effects of high-level natural radiation on the inhabitants, conducted at the field laboratory established by Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, did not find any evidence to implicate high-level natural radiation in any of the outcomes like chromosomal aberrations, karyotype anomalies, micronuclei, overall congenital anomalies, stillbirths, late onset diseases, or telomere length in human adults (Jaikrishan et al 1999;Cheriyan et al 1999;Thampi et al 2002Thampi et al , 2005Das and Karuppasamy 2009;Das et al 2009). Studies on cancer incidence among population of the HLNR area also failed to show any relationship with the high-level natural radiation (Nair et al 1999;Nair et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Radiation may induce germline mutations that may cause or abet congenital anomalies. Therefore, newborns from high and normal-level radiation areas are being monitored for the past three decades to study the association of elevated levels of natural radiation with congenital anomalies detectable at birth (Jaikrishan et al 1999;Cheriyan et al 1999;Thampi et al 2002Thampi et al , 2005. Further analysis is attempted to assess adverse pregnancy outcomes of stillbirth and overall as well as specific major congenital anomalies (MCA) like clubfoot, heart disease, Down syndrome, cleft lip/ palate, neural tube defects, and hypospadias after controlling for the effects of confounding/competing factors like maternal age at birth, gravida status, ethnicity, consanguinity, and gender of the newborn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%