2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:ejpp.0000032392.20106.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Markers for the Analysis of Variability and for Production of Specific Diagnostic Sequences in Fumonisin-Producing Strains of Fusarium Verticillioides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported for F. proliferatum strains isolated from date palm and banana, even when based on the analysis of the tef -1α gene, but using a significantly longer fragment of the gene (Jurado et al 2010). On the other hand, genes from the FUM cluster (particularly FUM1 ) were already accepted as good targets for phylogenetic studies and also for designing markers useful in the diagnostics of the fumonisin production ability of species from the G. fujikuroi species complex (Baird et al 2008; von Bargen et al 2009; González-Jaén et al 2004), as well as for distinguishing individual species belonging to the G. fujikuroi species complex (Stępień et al 2011). Of all of the isolates we used in the FUM1 analysis, the best distinguished group consisted of all six strains originating from garlic ( Allium sativum L.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were reported for F. proliferatum strains isolated from date palm and banana, even when based on the analysis of the tef -1α gene, but using a significantly longer fragment of the gene (Jurado et al 2010). On the other hand, genes from the FUM cluster (particularly FUM1 ) were already accepted as good targets for phylogenetic studies and also for designing markers useful in the diagnostics of the fumonisin production ability of species from the G. fujikuroi species complex (Baird et al 2008; von Bargen et al 2009; González-Jaén et al 2004), as well as for distinguishing individual species belonging to the G. fujikuroi species complex (Stępień et al 2011). Of all of the isolates we used in the FUM1 analysis, the best distinguished group consisted of all six strains originating from garlic ( Allium sativum L.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, genes and other sequences directly involved in secondary metabolism gained more attention in phylogenetic studies, as those have the advantage of possible usage in combined approaches to the diagnostics of mycotoxin production abilities (Proctor et al 2009). Therefore, genes from the FUM cluster merit investigation as a good additional marker for phylogenetic studies of fumonisin-producing Fusarium species (Baird et al 2008; González-Jaén et al 2004; Stępień et al 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high variability provided by these regions is particularly useful when it is necessary to discriminate among closely related species or at intraspecific level. Both ITS and IGS regions have been used to carry out phylogenetic and population studies in filamentous fungi [22][23][24][25][26][27] and to develop specific PCR assays to identify important mycotoxigenic species affecting commodities, such as Fusarium or Aspergillus [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following reference strains were used in the analyses as positive and negative controls: F. verticillioides A149 (Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas); Fusarium thapsinum M6561 (Fusarium Research Center, Department of Plant Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania); and Fusarium proliferatum MRC 8550 (PROMEC Unit of the South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa). Previous analysis of the F. thapsinum strains has shown that they do not possess the FUM1 gene González-Jaén et al 2004). The F. proliferatum reference strain was used as a negative control in the amplifications with the VERT-1 and VERT-2 primers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%