2013
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic evidence for introgression between domestic pigs and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Belgium and Luxembourg: a comparative approach with multiple marker systems

Abstract: Hybridization between wild species and their domestic relatives can be an important conservation and management problem. Genetic purity of the wild species is desirable per se and the phenomenon can have unpredictable evolutionary consequences. Declining European wild boar populations were frequently restocked with farmed wild boars that sometimes had been crossed with domestic pigs. We used simple polymerase chain reaction‐based diagnostic tests to detect the presence of mitochondrial DNA and coat colour alle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(73 reference statements)
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Polish WB populations we studied have some of Europe's highest levels of DS introgression. These levels are similar to those found in regions where DS are reared in semifree conditions (up to 10-20% in Canu et al 2016) or WB populations that have been restocked with captive-bred individuals that have been cross-bred with DS (27% in Frantz et al 2013). Since analysis using MC1R alleles is likely to severely underestimate the number of WB with a domestic ancestor (Frantz et al 2012, we cannot exclude the possibility that the real rate of introgression may be much higher than observed in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Polish WB populations we studied have some of Europe's highest levels of DS introgression. These levels are similar to those found in regions where DS are reared in semifree conditions (up to 10-20% in Canu et al 2016) or WB populations that have been restocked with captive-bred individuals that have been cross-bred with DS (27% in Frantz et al 2013). Since analysis using MC1R alleles is likely to severely underestimate the number of WB with a domestic ancestor (Frantz et al 2012, we cannot exclude the possibility that the real rate of introgression may be much higher than observed in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Nowadays, illegal and unauthorized hybridization in captivity and subsequent accidental escapes or intentional releases of captive-bred individuals constitutes the major source of the spread of domestic genes into wild boar populations (Koutsogiannouli et al 2010;Apollonio et al 2010;Frantz et al 2012Frantz et al , 2013McDevitt et al 2013;Canu et al 2014;Murakami et al 2014). We believe that high DS contribution to the local gene pool of free-living WB in Krajna and Kujawy may result from the clandestine release and/or escape of farmed WBs, that had been crossed with DS in captivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This threshold is crucial, and there is always a trade-off between assignment efficiency and accuracy. The selection of this threshold has varied between 0.01 and 0.2, depending on the hybridization study (McDevitt et al 2009;Senn and Pemberton 2009;Frantz et al 2013). In addition, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the adegenet (Jombart 2008) and ade4 (Dray and Dufour 2007) packages in R v.2.12.1 (R Development Core Team 2010).…”
Section: Microsatellite Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%