Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(01)00375-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity within an isolated olive (Olea europaea L.) population in relation to feral spread

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of polymorphic bands was 53.5, 53.9%, and 62% for the populations of Erechim, Barão de Cotegipe, and São José, respectively (as shown in Table 2). These values can be considered low if compared to the results obtained by Bittencourt (2000) in M. ilicifolia (84.6%), and other arboreal species such as Acacia raddiana with 90.69% (Shrestha et al, 2002), and Olea europaea with 91.5% (Mekuria et al, 2002) polymorphic bands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The percentage of polymorphic bands was 53.5, 53.9%, and 62% for the populations of Erechim, Barão de Cotegipe, and São José, respectively (as shown in Table 2). These values can be considered low if compared to the results obtained by Bittencourt (2000) in M. ilicifolia (84.6%), and other arboreal species such as Acacia raddiana with 90.69% (Shrestha et al, 2002), and Olea europaea with 91.5% (Mekuria et al, 2002) polymorphic bands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In several recent studies using dominant nuclear markers (eg RAPDs, AFLPs and ISSRs), a substantial, but not complete, discrimination was observed between cultivars from various geographical origins and oleasters from populations distributed over the Mediterranean Basin, each represented by a single individual tree, although no genetic marker was identified by the authors to discriminate unambiguously between wild oleasters and the putative feral forms (Angiolillo et al, 1999;Besnard et al, 2001a;Vargas and Kadereit, 2001;Bronzini de Caraffa et al, 2002a, b). Such results were observed even when the oleasters were collected in disturbed areas close to olive groves and were considered as being of feral origin (Angiolillo et al, 1999), and also in feral oleasters growing in Australia, where genuinely wild olive (in O. europaea) is not expected to grow (Mekuria et al, 2002). From the results of the present work, we suggest that the nuclear genetic differentiation observed between oleasters (whatever their origin) and cultivated olive may be attributable mostly to heterozygosity level differences and, very occasionally, to distinct allelic composition between these two fully interfertile partners of the same species.…”
Section: Geographic Allozyme Variation In Oleastersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…europaea (Green, 2002) and comprise olive cultivars grown for oil or table olives. In addition to these two olive forms, a third form resembling oleasters by their physiognomy, has escaped from cultivation, and has been called feral form (Besnard et al, 2001;Mekuria et al, 2002;Breton et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Olea Europaea Trees Spread In the Mediterraneanmentioning
confidence: 99%