2016
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-58392016000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity of Colombian sheep by microsatellite markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
2
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be said that there is loss of heterozygosity in four microsatellite loci studied considering F IS value is also known as the inbreeding coefficient. It is noteworthy that obtained general mean of F ST value is higher than earlier studies (Cemal et al 2013;Ben Sassi-Zaidy et al 2014;Ocampo et al 2016) and lower than others (Sodhi et al 2006;Yilmaz et al 2014). The differences between the previous literature and the present study were mainly due to non-comparative aspects such as studied microsatellite and breed differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be said that there is loss of heterozygosity in four microsatellite loci studied considering F IS value is also known as the inbreeding coefficient. It is noteworthy that obtained general mean of F ST value is higher than earlier studies (Cemal et al 2013;Ben Sassi-Zaidy et al 2014;Ocampo et al 2016) and lower than others (Sodhi et al 2006;Yilmaz et al 2014). The differences between the previous literature and the present study were mainly due to non-comparative aspects such as studied microsatellite and breed differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…It was an important parameter in the study that the F IS and F IT values were considerably lower than the numerous sheep breeds such as Colombian sheep breeds (Ocampo et al 2016), Tunisian native sheep breeds (Ben Sassi-Zaidy et al 2014) and Turkish native sheep breeds (Yilmaz et al 2014), and higher than the values reported by Cemal et al (2013). It can be said that there is loss of heterozygosity in four microsatellite loci studied considering F IS value is also known as the inbreeding coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Comparable genetic variability has been reported by E. Guang-Xin et al (2016) and R. Ocampoet al (2015) in 14 native Chinese sheep and Colombian sheep breeds [29][30]. Among the populations, Fixation index (F) varied from 0.035 for Kazakh Arkhar Merinos to 0.058 for Edilbai (0 < F < 1) [31]. As a result, Fixation index revealed the random-mating events in all populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Estimates of diversity in populations of sheep from Colombia presented mostly low heterozygosity, with values of Ho below the values of He, with means of 0.68 and 0.77 respectively [ 26 ]. In that study, the authors used 513 animals from 13 breeds from 56 farms, and values indicative of diversity were lower than those found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%