2013
DOI: 10.32607/20758251-2013-5-1-90-100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis from Different Geo-Ecological Regions of Ukraine by Analyzing the 16S rRNA and gyrB Genes and by AP-PCR and saAFLP

Abstract: The Bacillus cereus group consists of closely related species of bacteria and is of interest to researchers due to its importance in industry and medicine. However, it remains difficult to distinguish these bacteria at the intra- and inter-species level. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a member of the B. cereus group. In this work, we studied the inter-species structure of five entomopathogenic strains and 20 isolates of Bt, which were collected from different geo-ecological regions of Ukraine, using various me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, errors in conventional identification methods may lead to discordant results of MALDI-TOF MS identification [3]. Due to the high genetic and phenotypic similarity between B. thuringiensis and B. cereus [31,43], they might represent the same species [30], thus could not be distinguished based on sequencing alone [44]. For these reasons, we paid special attention to the verification of 22 strains to ensure specific biomarkers for reliable identification of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, errors in conventional identification methods may lead to discordant results of MALDI-TOF MS identification [3]. Due to the high genetic and phenotypic similarity between B. thuringiensis and B. cereus [31,43], they might represent the same species [30], thus could not be distinguished based on sequencing alone [44]. For these reasons, we paid special attention to the verification of 22 strains to ensure specific biomarkers for reliable identification of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, B. anthracis is non-motile, non-hemolytic, and non-penicillin resistant, which distinguishes it from B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides [28]. Both B. cereus and B. thuringiensis are motile; however, B. thuringiensis can be distinguished from B. cereus based on its ability to produce the Bt toxin [29][30][31]. However, it is known that phenotypic tests and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA genes could fail to differentiate between members of the B. cereus group [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16S rRNA gene sequencing is a routine method used for the taxonomic identification of bacteria [35] . However, the method has not been successful in clearly distinguishing the members of the B. cereus group of which B. thuringiensis is one of the member [35] . So, the partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were considered B. thuringiensis for the statistical counting if they showed maximum similarity to either B. thuringiensis or B. cereus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nearby strains were used for maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses. However, the use of other markers such as gyrB and XRE is recommended (Helgason et al, 2000;Punina et al, 2013;Wei et al, 2019) to identify all strains up to the species taxonomic level (Helgason et al, 2000;Punina et al, 2013;Wei et al, 2019).…”
Section: Strain Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%