2018
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2018.1226.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and genetic comparison of hazelnuts (Corylus avellanaL.) of Kayseri province of Turkey to major accessions of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Italy, Spain, and Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, single sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites have long been the preferred class of molecular markers for genotyping vegetatively propagated crops for their ability to discriminate at any stage of development, based on SSR multiallelism, high polymorphism, cost-effectiveness, and high reproducibility [ 24 ]. SSRs have been proven to be highly effective tools in assessing genetic diversity also in Corylus avellana L. [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. By these molecular markers, hazelnut germplasm collections have been fingerprinted, defining synonymies and homonymies [ 34 , 35 , 36 ], assessing genetic relationships and parentage [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], investigating the genetic structure of different populations comparing local cultivars and wild genotypes [ 29 , 32 , 38 , 42 , 43 ], and developing genetic maps for association analysis [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, single sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites have long been the preferred class of molecular markers for genotyping vegetatively propagated crops for their ability to discriminate at any stage of development, based on SSR multiallelism, high polymorphism, cost-effectiveness, and high reproducibility [ 24 ]. SSRs have been proven to be highly effective tools in assessing genetic diversity also in Corylus avellana L. [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. By these molecular markers, hazelnut germplasm collections have been fingerprinted, defining synonymies and homonymies [ 34 , 35 , 36 ], assessing genetic relationships and parentage [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], investigating the genetic structure of different populations comparing local cultivars and wild genotypes [ 29 , 32 , 38 , 42 , 43 ], and developing genetic maps for association analysis [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%