2018
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2018.1226.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population structure analysis of European hazelnut (Corylus avellana)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of genetic relationships among European hazelnut germplasm collections, according to their geographic origin, revealed that Italian and Iberian Peninsula genotypes clustered together [ 28 , 34 , 38 , 47 ]. More recently, the genetic structure of European hazelnut populations has been distinguishing seven main populations: Azerbaijan/Georgia, Central Anatolia, England, Italy, Spain, Black Sea, and Central Europe (Germany, Poland, Moscow) [ 41 ]. A closer phylogenetic relationship among all the cultivars from Western and Southern Europe, mostly from Spain and Italy, was then highlighted [ 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of genetic relationships among European hazelnut germplasm collections, according to their geographic origin, revealed that Italian and Iberian Peninsula genotypes clustered together [ 28 , 34 , 38 , 47 ]. More recently, the genetic structure of European hazelnut populations has been distinguishing seven main populations: Azerbaijan/Georgia, Central Anatolia, England, Italy, Spain, Black Sea, and Central Europe (Germany, Poland, Moscow) [ 41 ]. A closer phylogenetic relationship among all the cultivars from Western and Southern Europe, mostly from Spain and Italy, was then highlighted [ 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSRs have been proven to be highly effective tools in assessing genetic diversity also in Corylus avellana L. [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. By these molecular markers, hazelnut germplasm collections have been fingerprinted, defining synonymies and homonymies [ 34 , 35 , 36 ], assessing genetic relationships and parentage [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], investigating the genetic structure of different populations comparing local cultivars and wild genotypes [ 29 , 32 , 38 , 42 , 43 ], and developing genetic maps for association analysis [ 44 , 45 ]. More recently, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been utilized in hazelnut linkage maps [ 46 , 47 ] to assess the genetic diversity and to investigate the domestication history of European hazelnut [ 48 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, for such outcrossing and wind‐pollinated plants, a continuum of populations from wild to domesticated is a likely result of the domestication process (Miller & Gross, 2011). At a fine‐scale resolution within broad domestication centres, the population structure analysis of Gurcan et al (2018) on simple sequence repeats (SSRs) concluded that cultivated C. avellana consist of multiple genetic groups, and cultivars were likely selected from local wild populations rather than originating in one or two domestication centres. There does appear to be some geographical population structuring of C. avellana across its European range, however, and microsatellite markers in Italy and the Balkans were found to contrast those of other areas (Palmé & Vendramin, 2002).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehlenbacher [17] described 400 selected cultivars from various countries and often, cultivars with different names have identical genotype markers, which leads to confusion and incorrect cultivar labeling during the production process. Gürcan et al [18] suggested that the genetic structure population of European hazelnut consists of seven main populations: Azerbaijan/Georgia, Central Anatolia, England, Italy, Spain, Black Sea, and Central Europe (Germany, Poland, Moscow) based on the study of 582 accessions indicating diversity between clusters. In addition to the genotype, agricultural techniques, postharvest management, and orchard location all affect the morphological, physical, and chemical characteristics of hazelnuts, leading to preferred varieties in each growing area [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%