2015
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20150068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic divergence among grapevine varieties from the Active Germplasm Bank of Embrapa Semiárido

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, decrease in berry firmness was evident in grapes subjected to GA3 + CPPU + ABA treatment in both seasons. ABA application may negatively affect berries' firmness, a critical characteristic for the profitable postharvest handling of grapes for the fresh market because it affects shelf life and transportability (Batista et al 2015). ABA application is well known to cause decrease and loosening rigidity of the cell wall, leading to fruit softening and berries' cracking (Thomas et al 2008;Gambetta et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, decrease in berry firmness was evident in grapes subjected to GA3 + CPPU + ABA treatment in both seasons. ABA application may negatively affect berries' firmness, a critical characteristic for the profitable postharvest handling of grapes for the fresh market because it affects shelf life and transportability (Batista et al 2015). ABA application is well known to cause decrease and loosening rigidity of the cell wall, leading to fruit softening and berries' cracking (Thomas et al 2008;Gambetta et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the first four principal components had eigenvalues greater than 1, and thus, the data could be condensed into four factors, which explained 81% of the variance. In a study on genetic divergence among grapevine cultivars from the Active Germplasm Bank of Embrapa Semiárido, considering 11 fruit quality traits, it was found that two main components explained 79.45% of the total variance contained in the set of traits analyzed (Batista et al., 2015). At the same Germplasm Bank of Embrapa Semiárido, the genetic diversity and performance of grape cultivars were evaluated based on nine morphoagronomic traits (cycle duration, production, number of bunches, length, width and weight of the bunch, soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and ratio ) and four factors explained 84.12% of the variance (Leão et al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%