2021
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-0536-20210107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic dissimilarity, selection index and correlation estimation in a melon germplasm

Abstract: The success of breeding programs depends on genetic variability. Individuals selected based on a few traits may be a limitation. One alternative is the use of nonparametric indices. However, there is no information on the use of selection indices in melon germplasms. The present study aimed to estimate genetic dissimilarity in a melon germplasm and select potential parent plants for future breeding programs. The genetic material consisted of 37 melon accessions. The traits assessed were fruit diameter and leng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, SC1-Sesoswane had a significantly (P < 0.01) higher fruit number, it exhibited lower fruit diameter and rind thickness, which is typical of a seed melon type. Fruit diameter varied from 14.6 cm to 30.3 cm with an average of 25.9 cm, and this is relatively bigger than those of the 37 melons accession evaluated in Brazil which had a diameter range of 8.0 cm to 17.7 cm and average of 12.95 (Gomes et al, 2021). However, rind thickness of 2.0 cm observed in their study was in accordance with those recorded in this research with an average of 2.4 cm.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although, SC1-Sesoswane had a significantly (P < 0.01) higher fruit number, it exhibited lower fruit diameter and rind thickness, which is typical of a seed melon type. Fruit diameter varied from 14.6 cm to 30.3 cm with an average of 25.9 cm, and this is relatively bigger than those of the 37 melons accession evaluated in Brazil which had a diameter range of 8.0 cm to 17.7 cm and average of 12.95 (Gomes et al, 2021). However, rind thickness of 2.0 cm observed in their study was in accordance with those recorded in this research with an average of 2.4 cm.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Os resultados obtidos podem direcionar a seleção dos melhores indivíduos, de forma acurada, otimizando a eficácia dos programas de melhoramento Tabela 1. Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos, para as variáveis: massa média do fruto (MMF), comprimento do fruto (CP), diâmetro do fruto (DF), comprimento do pedúnculo (CP) e espessura do pericarpo (EP) em população em população F2 de pimenteira ornamental (C. annuum l. (Vargas et al, 2020), Cucumis melo (Gomes et al, 2021), Glycine max L. (Carneiro et al, 2021) e C. frutescens (Costa et al, 2021), o que confirma sua utilidade para a seleção de genótipos com características agronômicas favoráveis. Desta forma a transmissibilidade dessas características ao longo das gerações, sugere que as variáveis avaliadas neste estudo são relevantes para a seleção dos melhores genótipos, de acordo com os objetivos dos programas de melhoramento genético.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified