Genetic differentiation of Pinus mugo Turra and P. sylvestris L. populations in the Ukrainian Carpathians and the Swiss Alps

Sannikov, S. N.; Петрова, И. В.; Schweingruber, Fritz Hans; Егоров, Е. В.; Parpan, T. V.

doi:10.1134/s1067413611040151

Cited by 13 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, prominent differences were detected between Pyrenean and marginal populations of P. uncinata, based on nine cpDNA markers (Dzialuk et al, 2009). It was also shown that populations of the P. mugo complex from different mountain ranges were genetically different Dzialuk, Boraty nski, Boraty nska, & Burczyk, 2012;Sannikov, Petrova, Schweingruber, Egorov, & Parpan, 2011). The nucleotide diversity of P. mugo, P. uncinata and P. uliginosa, however, demonstrated a lack of clear assignment to species, which suggested a common evolutionary history and inter-specific gene flow (Wachowiak, Boraty nska, & Cavers, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…The different characters of East and West Carpathian populations of P. mugo s. s. were described based on cone characteristics (Staszkiewicz & Tyszkiewicz, 1976), and differences between the East Carpathian and the West Carpathian, Sudetan and Alpine populations were described based on needle and cone characteristics (Boraty nska et al, 2005). The separation between the East Carpathian and Alpine populations of the P. mugo complex was also found using 14 allozyme loci (Sannikov et al, 2011). The results described above seems to indicate the different origin of East-and South-Carpathian populations of P. mugo, when compared with Alpine and West-Carpathian populations of the species.…”

Section: Multivariate Relationships Between Taxamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Taxonomic and geographic differentiation ofPinus mugocomplex on the needle characteristics

Boratyńska

Jasiñska

Boratyński

2015

Systematics and Biodiversity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The phenotypic differentiation of Pinus mugo complex was verified using 31 populations of P. mugo sensu stricto, 11 of P. uncinata, five of P. uliginosa, one of the potential hybrids P. uliginosa £ P. mugo and three of P. sylvestris, the latter as a control. The 22 morphological and anatomical needle characteristics were measured and statistically examined to describe the taxa and the population within the taxa differentiation. All the taxa of the P. mugo complex differed significantly from P. sylvestris in most of the verified needle characteristics. Within P. mugo complex, populations of P. uncinata were clearly distinguished from P. mugo s. s. The population of potential hybrid origin was the most similar to P. uliginosa. Populations of the latter taxon were strongly differentiated; some of them were closer to P. uncinata, and others to P. mugo s. s. Within the whole sampled data, three geographic groups of populations were detected: the first included P. uncinata and two of P. uliginosa, the second contained East and South Carpathian P. mugo s. s. with the presumed hybrid population, and the third contained all the other populations of P. mugo s. s. and P. uliginosa. Within P. mugo s. s., the Sudetan populations formed a separate group. Pinus uncinata from the Pyrenees reflected a high level of differentiation. The marginal populations of this taxon (Cebollera, G udar, Massif Central) also differed from those in the Pyrenees. The phenotypic differentiation of taxa and populations appeared similar to that which was detected based on cpDNA markers.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Multivariate Relationships Between Taxamentioning

confidence: 99%

Taxonomic and geographic differentiation ofPinus mugocomplex on the needle characteristics

Boratyńska

Jasiñska

Boratyński

2015

Systematics and Biodiversity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, variations in mtDNA genetic markers originally developed for P. sylvestris (Soranzo et al 2000) are also too weak to make significant inferences regarding postglacial history of P. mugo (Wachowiak et al 2013). A few studies using chloroplast microsatellite markers and/or isozymes have demonstrated the high genetic diversity accompanied by low interpopulation differentiation of P. mugo (Lewandowski et al 2000;Slavov and Zhelev 2004;Heuertz et al 2010;Sannikov et al 2011;Dzialuk et al 2012;Boratyńska et al 2014). Higher differentiation among mountain ranges than within these areas was also shown (Dzialuk et al 2012;Boratyńska et al 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Nuclear microsatellite markers reveal the low genetic structure of Pinus mugo Turra (dwarf mountain pine) populations in Europe

Żukowska

Wachowiak

2017

Plant Syst Evol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Twenty-one populations (555 individuals) covering the entire native range of Pinus mugo Turra (dwarf mountain pine) were investigated for genetic variation scored at 13 nuclear microsatellite markers (nSSRs). The main objective of the present study was to determine the genetic structure across the present distribution of the species and locate populations of different genetic compositions. Most of the genetic variation was observed within the populations (95%). The assignment of populations based on Bayesian clustering methods revealed that the Sudeten populations of P. mugo form a separate genetic cluster. These stands have likely been established through the founder effects of Alpine migrants. The distribution and level of SSR polymorphisms, along with no evidence of isolation by distance or phylogeographic structure, indicate that the present populations of P. mugo have diverged relatively recently and originate from a larger glacial distribution of the species. One peripheral stand from Italy had the lowest values of most calculated genetic variation indices. This stand could therefore be more susceptible to genetic drift and a negative impact of predicted environmental changes. We discuss our findings with respect to previously published results on the genetic and morphological variation of P. mugo and with consideration for the conservation genetics of the species.

show abstract

“…To date, studies on P. mugo have been mainly focused on characterization of morphological and anatomical variability (Boratyńska et al 2004;Boratyńska et al 2005;, and analysis of genetic structure using isozymes (Slavov and Zhelev 2004;Korshikov and Pirko 2002;Sannikov et al 2011), and DNA markers (Celiński et al 2013a;Celiński et al 2013b;Dzialuk et al 2012;Heuertz et al 2010;Wachowiak et al 2013). However, little is known about the geographic patterns of genetic diversity of this species.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Biogeography and evolutionary factors determine genetic differentiation of Pinus mugo (Turra) in the Tatra Mountains (Central Europe)

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Genetic differentiation of Pinus mugo Turra and P. sylvestris L. populations in the Ukrainian Carpathians and the Swiss Alps

Cited by 13 publications

References 17 publications

Taxonomic and geographic differentiation ofPinus mugocomplex on the needle characteristics

Taxonomic and geographic differentiation ofPinus mugocomplex on the needle characteristics

Nuclear microsatellite markers reveal the low genetic structure of Pinus mugo Turra (dwarf mountain pine) populations in Europe

Biogeography and evolutionary factors determine genetic differentiation of Pinus mugo (Turra) in the Tatra Mountains (Central Europe)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About