2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0141-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic determination and correlation of body weight and body mass index (BMI) and cross-sectional geometric parameters of the femoral neck

Abstract: In summary, our study suggested that body weight, BMI, and femoral neck geometry were under strong genetic determination. The strong genetic correlations suggested that the genetic factors of bone geometry may be overlapped with those of body weight and BMI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimates are slightly higher than those estimated from a Chinese adult family–based cohort (55% to 57%). (36) We also observed that shared genetics significantly contributed to the observed inverse PFM-bone relationships, indicating a set of genes shared by both PFM and bone parameters. These findings are consistent with a previous study in white adults(37) and may be explained by current understanding about the reciprocal differentiation of adipocytes (the main origin of adipokines) and osteoblasts, which each originate from the same mesenchymal stem cells in a mutually exclusive way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…These estimates are slightly higher than those estimated from a Chinese adult family–based cohort (55% to 57%). (36) We also observed that shared genetics significantly contributed to the observed inverse PFM-bone relationships, indicating a set of genes shared by both PFM and bone parameters. These findings are consistent with a previous study in white adults(37) and may be explained by current understanding about the reciprocal differentiation of adipocytes (the main origin of adipokines) and osteoblasts, which each originate from the same mesenchymal stem cells in a mutually exclusive way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The five estimated FNGPs are: (1) W , femoral neck periosteal diameter; (2) CSA, the area with mineralized bone tissue, excluded bone marrow space; (3) Z , an index of bending resistance; (4) CT, cortical thickness; and (5) BR, an index of bone geometric instability [14]. FNGPs were computed as follows: CSA=BMD×Wρm, where ρ m is the effective density of fully mineralized bone tissue, which is assumed to be 1.05 g/cm 2 [25, 26], and W , the femoral neck periosteal diameter, can be estimated by dividing the bone size by the width of the region of interest (in Hologic DXA systems, the width of the femoral neck region is standardized at 1.5 cm) [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regards to muscle strength and power, genetic effects explain 30%–50% in postmenopausal age group [77, 78]. Analogously, the heritability of bone strength, measured with section modulus of femoral neck, has been reported to be 40 to 55% [76].…”
Section: Interaction Between Postmenopausal Sarcopenia and Osteopomentioning
confidence: 99%