2009
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa0806544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Compensation in a Human Genomic Disorder

Abstract: Cytogenetic studies of the parents of a girl with the DiGeorge (or velocardiofacial) syndrome, who carried a deletion at 22q11.2, revealed an unexpected rearrangement of both 22q11.2 regions in the unaffected father. He carried a 22q11.2 deletion on one copy of chromosome 22 and a reciprocal 22q11.2 duplication on the other copy of chromosome 22. Genetic compensation, which is consistent with the normal phenotype of the father, was shown through quantitative-expression analyses of genes located within the gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenotypic differences between mutants and morphants may be due to the activation of a compensatory network in mutants [76,77]. Actually, net1 MO1 or siRNA1 injection caused dorsal fate defects in wild-type embryos, but did not influence the dorsal development of mutants (Supplementary information, Figure S13F and S13G), indicating the specificity of the MOs and siRNAs used to knock-down zebrafish net1 in our study and the insensitiveness of the net1 mutants to net1 MOs and siRNAs.…”
Section: Net1 Activates An Unidentified Rho Family Gtpase To Regulatementioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phenotypic differences between mutants and morphants may be due to the activation of a compensatory network in mutants [76,77]. Actually, net1 MO1 or siRNA1 injection caused dorsal fate defects in wild-type embryos, but did not influence the dorsal development of mutants (Supplementary information, Figure S13F and S13G), indicating the specificity of the MOs and siRNAs used to knock-down zebrafish net1 in our study and the insensitiveness of the net1 mutants to net1 MOs and siRNAs.…”
Section: Net1 Activates An Unidentified Rho Family Gtpase To Regulatementioning
confidence: 69%
“…Surprisingly, net1 mutants display no obvious developmental defects; and are also, importantly, insensitive to the injection of net1 MOs or siRNAs. Previous biochemical and genetic studies as well as clinical reports indicate that compensatory changes may allow organisms to adapt to genetic mutations [77,83,84]. Such properties have also been described in zebrafish genetic studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To our knowledge, this family is the first where both a deletion and a duplication carrier have been identified in a single sibship. We first hypothesized that the occurrence of fam- ilies with both deletion and duplication siblings was a consequence of dosage compensation in one of the parents [Carelle-Calmels et al, 2009;Alkalay et al, 2011;Fernández et al, 2012]. Dosage compensation is defined as a rearrangement resulting in a 22q11.2 deletion and the reciprocal duplication in 2 homologous chromosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interessanterweise konnte jüngst beim gesunden Vater einer Patientin mit Mikrodeletion 22q11 gezeigt werden, dass Compound-Heterozygotie für eine Deletion und eine Duplikation in 22q11.2 kompensatorisch wirken [7]. Das damit verbundene 100%ige Wiederholungsrisiko für Nachkommen mit Imbalance in diesem Bereich unterstreicht die Notwendigkeit, auch gesunde Eltern mittels FISH zu untersuchen.…”
Section: Fallunclassified