2006
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs.75.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Characterization of Flowering Cherries (Prunus subgenus Cerasus) Using rp116-rp114 Spacer Sequences of Chloroplast DNA

Abstract: Genetic variations among flowering cherries (Prunus subgenus Cerasus) were analyzed by spacer sequences between ribosomal protein L16 (rpl16) and ribosomal protein L14 (rpl14) genes of chloroplast DNA, these sequences were named plastid subtype ID (PS-ID), by using a total of 40 individuals from 11 species and 3 cultivars. Nucleotide sequences of ca. 420 bp were identified as part of rpl16 gene and PS-ID regions. One mutation site was found in partial nucleotide sequences of rpl16 gene. Five different A-repeat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, in addition, we analyzed the rpl16 coding region and the rpl16-rpl14 IGS, which was proposed as a plastid subtype ID (PS-ID) for discrimination of plastid subtypes in higher plants (Nakamura et al 1997). The PS-ID sequence has practically been used to evaluate genetic variation in different cultivars of rice (Ishikawa et al 2002) and flowering cherries (Ohta et al 2006), due to the variable rpl16-rpl14 IGS sequence. However, to our knowledge, no detailed study of Gentiana species except G. scabra (Nakamura et al 1997) using this PS-ID sequence has been determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in addition, we analyzed the rpl16 coding region and the rpl16-rpl14 IGS, which was proposed as a plastid subtype ID (PS-ID) for discrimination of plastid subtypes in higher plants (Nakamura et al 1997). The PS-ID sequence has practically been used to evaluate genetic variation in different cultivars of rice (Ishikawa et al 2002) and flowering cherries (Ohta et al 2006), due to the variable rpl16-rpl14 IGS sequence. However, to our knowledge, no detailed study of Gentiana species except G. scabra (Nakamura et al 1997) using this PS-ID sequence has been determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spachiana (E750) (Wilson 1916;Innan et al 1995;Ohta et al 2006) F 1 progenies in this study (Tsuruta et al 2012) Origin of Somei-yoshino Species level pseudo-backcross (P1BC1) Fig. 1 Previously reported origin of Cerasus×yedoensis 'Someiyoshino' (Wilson 1916;Innan et al 1995;Ohta et al 2006) and our mapping strategy of Bspecies level backcross^of P1BC 1 analysis for fitness with the expected maternal or paternal segregation ratio (1:1). Maternal (CY) and paternal (E750) linkage maps were constructed using segregating SSRs, following a pseudo-testcross strategy (Grattapaglia and Sederoff 1994).…”
Section: Cerasus Spachiana (Unknown)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Someiyoshino is considered to be a hybrid of two wild cherry species, C. spachiana as a maternal tree and Cerasus speciosa (Koidz.) H. Ohba as the pollen donor (Wilson 1916;Innan et al 1995;Ohta et al 2006). Therefore, seedling inviability observed in F 1 progeny of CY×E750 is predicted to be a hybrid breakdown (weakness, sterility, or inviability observed in F 2 or later progeny) between ancestral C. spachiana and C. speciosa or an inbreeding depression within the species of C. spachiana.…”
Section: Communicated By E Dirlewangermentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ancestral species of cultivars Cultivars of ornamental plants, including several primroses, have often been produced by interspecific hybridization (Iwata et al 2000, Richards 2003, Tanaka et al 2005, Ohta et al 2006; however, it was considered that all cultivars analyzed in this study were derived from P. sieboldii only, as judged from cpDNA variation and successful PCR amplification of microsatellite loci. The cpDNA haplotypes detected in the cultivars were the same as, or closely related to, those of wild P. sieboldii, and were clearly different from those of its closely related species, P. kisoana.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%