2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic characterization of an X-STR decaplex on the population of Pichincha (Ecuador)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum frequency was of 0.4867 for allele 10 (DXS8378). The frequencies for loci DXS7132, DXS8378, DXS7423 are comparable to the study carried out in the province of Pichincha -Ecuador [6] where DXS8378 has the highest frequency reported of 0.6038 (allele 10). For the Ecuadorian population, the most polymorphic marker was the DXS10135 locus, with the highest heterozygosity observed (Ho = 0.9300) and power of exclusion (PE = 0.8570), polymorphism information content (PIC F = 0.9313), T Table 1 Allele frequencies for twelve X-STR markers of the Ecuadorian population.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum frequency was of 0.4867 for allele 10 (DXS8378). The frequencies for loci DXS7132, DXS8378, DXS7423 are comparable to the study carried out in the province of Pichincha -Ecuador [6] where DXS8378 has the highest frequency reported of 0.6038 (allele 10). For the Ecuadorian population, the most polymorphic marker was the DXS10135 locus, with the highest heterozygosity observed (Ho = 0.9300) and power of exclusion (PE = 0.8570), polymorphism information content (PIC F = 0.9313), T Table 1 Allele frequencies for twelve X-STR markers of the Ecuadorian population.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, due to their high polymorphism information content, they are very informative for population studies of diverse ethnic groups [3]. The present study analyzes different forensic parameters in 12 X-STRs of which there have 8 new markers (DXS10148, DXS10135, DXS10079, DXS10074, DXS10103, DXS10101, DXS10146 and DXS10134) compared to decaplex multiplex system previously used [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the samples had different X-STR profiles and the subjects were not closely related through the maternal line. We compared these data to the ethnic groups from Ecuador [ 20 , 26 , 27 ]. None of the resulting profiles had been previously observed in these populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted using FTA buffer reagent according to manufacturer's recommendations (Whatman-GE Healthcare). X-STR amplification was performed in accordance with Gusmão et al [6], including some modifications by Gaviria et al [7]. Alleles were separated and detected using the 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allele frequencies, Heterozygosity, power discrimination (PD), and Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) were calculated with FORSTAT v1.0 [8]; Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium were tested with GenePop v4.2 [9] and power of exclusion (PE) in trios and duos were calculated according Desmarais et al in Microsoft Excel [10]. Using the platform GenAlEx [11], pairwise population comparison for the 10 X-STRs (F ST genetic distance analysis), and an Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) were performance between Imbabura, Pichincha province and Ecuador [7,12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%