2012
DOI: 10.2174/138920212803251382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Association Studies: An Information Content Perspective

Abstract: The availability of high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data has made the human genetic association studies possible to identify common and rare variants underlying complex diseases in a genome-wide scale. A handful of novel genetic variants have been identified, which gives much hope and prospects for the future of genetic association studies. In this process, statistical and computational methods play key roles, among which information-based association tests have gained large popularity. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The allele and genotype frequencies of two IFN‐γ variants, +874 T>A and UTR5644 A>T, in patients with active brucellosis and controls are listed in Table . It has been established that OR < 1 along with P < 0.05 is associated with lower risk of disease (protective factor), whereas OR > 1 along with P < 0.05 is associated with higher risk of disease (risk factor) . A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding allelic and genotyping distribution of the position at +874 T>A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The allele and genotype frequencies of two IFN‐γ variants, +874 T>A and UTR5644 A>T, in patients with active brucellosis and controls are listed in Table . It has been established that OR < 1 along with P < 0.05 is associated with lower risk of disease (protective factor), whereas OR > 1 along with P < 0.05 is associated with higher risk of disease (risk factor) . A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding allelic and genotyping distribution of the position at +874 T>A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we are interested in the identification of lipid-treatment (or environment) interactions through penalization. The success of set based analysis, including those for the gene set [44] and SNP set [45,46], has tremendously motivated the development of statistical methods for G × E interactions from marginal analyses ( [47,48]) to penalization methods [17,18,49]. Our model can be potentially extended in the following aspects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In marginal analysis, statistical testing of G×E interactions prevails, which spans from the classical linear model with interactions in a wide range of studies, such as case-control study, case only study and the two-stage screening study, to more sophisticated models, such as empirical Bayesian models and nonparametric and semiparametric models. 44 On the other hand, the joint methods, especially the penalized variable selection methods, for G×E interactions, have been motivated by the success of gene set-based association analysis over marginal analysis, as demonstrated by Wu and Cui, 45 Wu et al, 46 and Schaid et al 47 Recently, multiple penalization methods have been proposed to identify important G×E interactions under parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric models recently. 7,8,11,12 Within the Bayesian framework, nonlinear interaction has not been sufficiently considered for G×E interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%