2019
DOI: 10.1002/sim.8434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiparametric Bayesian variable selection for gene‐environment interactions

Abstract: Many complex diseases are known to be affected by the interactions between genetic variants and environmental exposures beyond the main genetic and environmental effects. Study of gene-environment (G×E) interactions is important for elucidating the disease etiology. Existing Bayesian methods for G×E interaction studies are challenged by the high-dimensional nature of the study and the complexity of environmental influences. Many studies have shown the advantages of penalization methods in detecting G×E interac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next stage in our methodological development is to extend the decision analysis selection approach for (i) all pairwise interactions and (ii) nonlinear models. While our focus is restricted to interactions between social stressors and environmental exposures, other analyses may require consideration of the complete collection of pairwise interactions 56,57 . The proposed model‐based penalization strategy () offers a path forward and welcomes hierarchical or interaction‐sparsity penalties 58 —as well as the accompanying estimation algorithms—into our decision analysis framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next stage in our methodological development is to extend the decision analysis selection approach for (i) all pairwise interactions and (ii) nonlinear models. While our focus is restricted to interactions between social stressors and environmental exposures, other analyses may require consideration of the complete collection of pairwise interactions 56,57 . The proposed model‐based penalization strategy () offers a path forward and welcomes hierarchical or interaction‐sparsity penalties 58 —as well as the accompanying estimation algorithms—into our decision analysis framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as we know, Wu et al have proposed many effective methods such as semiparametric bayesian variable selection, additive varying-coefficient model, penalized robust semiparametric approach, etc. in dealing with gene-environment interactions [26][27][28][29]. Here, we offer two ideas of combining environmental covariates with genetic data when inferring regulations from the perspective of a matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as data contamination and outliers have been widely observed in repeated measurements, robust variable selection methods in G × E interaction studies [23,[50][51][52] can be extended to longitudinal settings. Second, recently, multiple Bayesian methods have been proposed for pinpointing important G × E interaction effects [53][54][55]. Within the framework of analyzing repeated measurements, Bayesian variable selection for interactions has not been extensively examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methods can be readily adopted to conduct marginal identification of interaction effects when the phenotypes are repeatedly measured. In addition, robust variable selection for G×E interactions have been proposed [51][52][53] . In longitudinal G×E studies, the robustness of QIF framework to data contamination in the response can be potentially improved by modifying the weight in estimating equation to downweigh the influences of outliers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%