2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and serological identification of three Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains as candidates for novel provisional O serotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, 13 kinds of O antigens and 71 kinds of K antigens have been identified [33]. However, V. parahaemolyticus with untypeable and new O or K antigens have been frequently isolated [10,34,35]. Therefore, further new O and K antigens could be expected in V. parahaemolyticus in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, 13 kinds of O antigens and 71 kinds of K antigens have been identified [33]. However, V. parahaemolyticus with untypeable and new O or K antigens have been frequently isolated [10,34,35]. Therefore, further new O and K antigens could be expected in V. parahaemolyticus in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only four studies have explored the use of molecular methods for serogroup or serotype identification of V. parahaemolyticus to-date. Conventional PCR-based assays have been developed for the identification of O-serogroups (Chen et al, 2012; Guo et al, 2017) and serotype O3:K6 (Yeung et al, 2003), whereas the utility of MALDI-ToF has been explored for the identification for serotype O4:K8 (Li et al, 2018). However, the practical application of these methods has significant limitations, such as the need for cumbersome procedures associated with gel electrophoresis and the ability to only identify limited or single serogroups and serotypes simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a better understanding of the OGD through genetic analyses would further improve the current O-antigenic scheme. A recent study has shown that the frequent occurrence of untypeable O-serogroups (OUTs) may have resulted from intra-species recombination events that occurred within the OGD region and evolved from the current O-serogroups, where several provisional and rare O-serogroup candidates were proposed (Guo et al, 2017). Whereas, for K- serogroups, the genetic locations for encoding K-antigen synthesis in V. parahaemolyticus (Guvener and Mccarter, 2003; Okura et al, 2003) have been a subject of debate, but was subsequently confirmed to be between gmhD and rjg using an O3:K6 isolate by construction of gene deletions (Chen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, serotyping is labor-intensive, and only a few reference laboratories have the capacity to perform the analyses necessary to identify serotypes ( Ballmer et al, 2007 ; Lacher et al, 2014 ). In addition, conventional serological assays that are based on agglutination reactions are also limited by the risks of the high prevalence of non-typeable isolates due to the expression of novel polysaccharide forms, which is common in clinical isolates ( Jenney et al, 2006 ; Thrane et al, 2016 ; Guo et al, 2017 ). The development of NGS technologies and automated data analysis pipelines has led to a number of proof-of-concept studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%