1979
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100023072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and phenotypic parameters of Australian Large White and Landrace boars performance-tested when offered food ad libitum

Abstract: Genetic analyses were carried out on 935 Large White and 767 Land-race boars performance-tested from 25 kg to 80 kg live weight under individual andad libitumfeeding conditions. Traits analysed were daily weight gain (GR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), daily feed intake (FI) and subcutaneous fat depth (F). Genetic parameters were estimated from sire components obtained by conventional hierarchical analyses of variance and covariance.Large White pigs grew faster, had higher intakes of feed and utilized it more e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same report (Garwood and Diehl, 1987), the component traits of density were indicated to be highly heritable (82%, body weight; 66%, body volume). However, a similar situation has been reported in swine for the feed conversion ratio, wherein Bernard and Fahmy (1970) and Jungst et al (1981) reported realized heritabilities substantially less than estimates from the covariance among relatives (Dickerson and Grimes, 1947;Park, 1965;Robison and Berruecos, 1973;McPhee et al, 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In the same report (Garwood and Diehl, 1987), the component traits of density were indicated to be highly heritable (82%, body weight; 66%, body volume). However, a similar situation has been reported in swine for the feed conversion ratio, wherein Bernard and Fahmy (1970) and Jungst et al (1981) reported realized heritabilities substantially less than estimates from the covariance among relatives (Dickerson and Grimes, 1947;Park, 1965;Robison and Berruecos, 1973;McPhee et al, 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This is somewhat surprising, particularly in view of the substantial realized selection differentials achieved for this trait (Table 3). In addition, there is evidence to suggest that the genetic correlation between DLWG and carcass lean content may also be unfavourable under ad libitum feeding (McPhee et al, 1979). However, McPhee (1981) using a similar selection index and testing procedure to those of this study also produced no improvement in growth rate.…”
Section: (Fi 1 = H 2 [1 -H 2 {\ -P)} O 2 /Ns + H 2 a 2 /Ncmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Determination of leanness is not straightforward, and unfavourable genetic correlations between growth and leanness (Mcphee et al, 1979;Cleveland et al, 1982) make joint improvement of these traits a challenge. Fowler et al (1976) showed that lean meat growth can be selected by using an economic selection index that combines lean meat content and growth or by using lean meat growth, which is measured as lean gain per day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%