2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02054.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and environmental influence on attachment disorganization

Abstract: The study suggests a gene-environment interaction whereby biological determinants of attachment disorganization are moderated by social experiences. Different pathways of the development of attachment disorganization are discussed based on a bio-behavioral model of development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
3
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
85
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These scales are clearly grounded in attachment theory and were designed to assess the quality of maternal behavior tailored to a specific infant and to explain individual differences in attachment quality (Ainsworth, Bell, & Stayton, 1971;Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978). To this day the original Ainsworth sensitivity observation scale (Ainsworth, Bell, & Stayton, 1974), is still used in empirical studies (e.g., Fearon et al, 2006;Gonzalez, Jenkins, Steiner, & Fleming, 2012;Spangler, Johann, Ronai, & Zimmerman, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scales are clearly grounded in attachment theory and were designed to assess the quality of maternal behavior tailored to a specific infant and to explain individual differences in attachment quality (Ainsworth, Bell, & Stayton, 1971;Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978). To this day the original Ainsworth sensitivity observation scale (Ainsworth, Bell, & Stayton, 1974), is still used in empirical studies (e.g., Fearon et al, 2006;Gonzalez, Jenkins, Steiner, & Fleming, 2012;Spangler, Johann, Ronai, & Zimmerman, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gervai et al (2005) Bakermans-Kranenburg & van Ijzendoorn, 2004;Gervai et al, 2007;Lee Raby et al, 2013;Luijk et al, 2011;Spangler et al, 2009; Strangely, Luijk et al (2011) actually found opposite trends in each cohort. In the American cohort, infants without the 7R allele developed higher levels of security if their mother was more sensitive but in the Dutch cohort, the trend was in the opposite direction.…”
Section: Attachment Disorganization and The Dopamine D4 Receptor Genementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Liu et al, 1997;Nachmias et al, 1996;Spangler et al, 2009) as well as later cognitive and social development (e.g. Ainsworth et al, 1974;Bohlin et al, 2000;Jacobsen et al, 1994).…”
Section: History Of Attachment Disorganizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, molecular studies have found significant interactions between variations in infant 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and early maternal care (i.e., responsiveness, quality of parenting behavior) in predicting attachment security (mean age = 7 months; Barry et al 2008), attachment disorganization (mean age = 12 months; Spangler et al 2009) and later negative emotionality and fear (mean age = 18 months; Pauli-Pott et al 2009). Significant interactions were also found with child attachment-related experiences (i.e., child-mother attachment relationship, attachment representation, etc.)…”
Section: -Httmentioning
confidence: 99%