The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-013-0515-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis reveals the costs of peri-urban development for the endangered grassland earless dragon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 154 striped legless lizards analysed from six Canberra populations in this study, we observed relatively high levels of genetic diversity (mean A = 11.5, mean A R = 8.9, mean H E = 0.80) as compared to other threatened reptiles that co-occur in these grassland habitats. For example, similar diversity measures (mean A = 8.8 and 14.8, mean A R = 8.4 and 11.7 and mean H E = 0.81 and 0.84) were observed in two separate studies of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) (Hoehn et al 2013;Carlson et al 2016), and in the closely related pink-tailed worm-lizard (Aprasia parapulchella) (mean A = 4.9 and H E = 0.52) (Knopp and Sarre 2012), which are both grassland specialists that inhabit native grasslands of the Australian Capital Territory (which includes the Canberra region). Levels of diversity were also comparable in the Australian Alpine Skink (Pseudemoia cryodroma) (mean A = 10.9, mean A R = 8.5 and mean H E = 0.71; Haines et al 2017) and the mountain log skink (Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii) (mean A = 12.2 and mean H E = 0.85; Stapely et al 2003) and in several more distantly related species such as the northern grass lizard (Takydromus septentrionalis) (Guo et al 2015), the "fire-specialist" lizards Amphibolorus norrisi, Ctenotus atlas, and Nephrurus stellatus (Smith et al 2011), the arboreal geckos Oedura reticulata and Gehyra variegata (Hoehn et al 2007), the Australian scincid lizards Tiliqua rugosa and T. adelaidensus (Gardner et al 2008) and the limbless lizard (Anniella alexanderae) (Wogan et al 2015), where observed diversity measures ranged from A = 7.8 to 16.4 and H E = 0.77 to 0.90.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Of the 154 striped legless lizards analysed from six Canberra populations in this study, we observed relatively high levels of genetic diversity (mean A = 11.5, mean A R = 8.9, mean H E = 0.80) as compared to other threatened reptiles that co-occur in these grassland habitats. For example, similar diversity measures (mean A = 8.8 and 14.8, mean A R = 8.4 and 11.7 and mean H E = 0.81 and 0.84) were observed in two separate studies of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) (Hoehn et al 2013;Carlson et al 2016), and in the closely related pink-tailed worm-lizard (Aprasia parapulchella) (mean A = 4.9 and H E = 0.52) (Knopp and Sarre 2012), which are both grassland specialists that inhabit native grasslands of the Australian Capital Territory (which includes the Canberra region). Levels of diversity were also comparable in the Australian Alpine Skink (Pseudemoia cryodroma) (mean A = 10.9, mean A R = 8.5 and mean H E = 0.71; Haines et al 2017) and the mountain log skink (Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii) (mean A = 12.2 and mean H E = 0.85; Stapely et al 2003) and in several more distantly related species such as the northern grass lizard (Takydromus septentrionalis) (Guo et al 2015), the "fire-specialist" lizards Amphibolorus norrisi, Ctenotus atlas, and Nephrurus stellatus (Smith et al 2011), the arboreal geckos Oedura reticulata and Gehyra variegata (Hoehn et al 2007), the Australian scincid lizards Tiliqua rugosa and T. adelaidensus (Gardner et al 2008) and the limbless lizard (Anniella alexanderae) (Wogan et al 2015), where observed diversity measures ranged from A = 7.8 to 16.4 and H E = 0.77 to 0.90.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Ensuring the resilience of urban populations requires large population sizes to maintain sufficient genetic variation for natural selection to act upon (Sgrò et al, ). Consequently, to facilitate movement between populations and promote the maintenance of genetic diversity and long‐term persistence of populations, the authors recommended the protection, rehabilitation, and connection of the lizard's grassland habitats (Hoehn et al, ). Large, diverse populations can also be achieved through strategies such as building and conserving sufficiently large parks, curbing urban sprawl, and creating dispersal corridors between populations, potentially along existing roadways and railways (Haddad, ), as well as riparian zones (Edge et al, ).…”
Section: Applications Of Urban Evolutionary Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this outcome, it will be necessary for urban scientists to redefine how they study urban ecosystems and communicate their findings to help decision-makers incorporate evolutionary insights into practice. For example, highways severely limit the dispersal of an endangered Australian lizard, Tympanocryptis pinguicolla Mitchell (earless dragon), which has resulted in the isolation and genetic differentiation of remnant populations, and declines in abundance (Hoehn, Dimond, Osborne, & Sarre, 2013). Ensuring the resilience of urban populations requires large population sizes to maintain sufficient genetic variation for natural selection to act upon (Sgrò et al, 2010).…”
Section: Urban Planning and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population sizes at several of those sites have declined since surveys began and the lizards have become undetectable in some places [43]. The populations that remain are heavily fragmented by roads, airports and other infrastructure forming genetically discrete populations in most cases [44]. A major population distributional disjunction that may pre-date the European settlement of Canberra occurs to the north and south of the Molonglo River which splits Canberra.…”
Section: Taxonomic Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%