“…Of the 154 striped legless lizards analysed from six Canberra populations in this study, we observed relatively high levels of genetic diversity (mean A = 11.5, mean A R = 8.9, mean H E = 0.80) as compared to other threatened reptiles that co-occur in these grassland habitats. For example, similar diversity measures (mean A = 8.8 and 14.8, mean A R = 8.4 and 11.7 and mean H E = 0.81 and 0.84) were observed in two separate studies of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) (Hoehn et al 2013;Carlson et al 2016), and in the closely related pink-tailed worm-lizard (Aprasia parapulchella) (mean A = 4.9 and H E = 0.52) (Knopp and Sarre 2012), which are both grassland specialists that inhabit native grasslands of the Australian Capital Territory (which includes the Canberra region). Levels of diversity were also comparable in the Australian Alpine Skink (Pseudemoia cryodroma) (mean A = 10.9, mean A R = 8.5 and mean H E = 0.71; Haines et al 2017) and the mountain log skink (Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii) (mean A = 12.2 and mean H E = 0.85; Stapely et al 2003) and in several more distantly related species such as the northern grass lizard (Takydromus septentrionalis) (Guo et al 2015), the "fire-specialist" lizards Amphibolorus norrisi, Ctenotus atlas, and Nephrurus stellatus (Smith et al 2011), the arboreal geckos Oedura reticulata and Gehyra variegata (Hoehn et al 2007), the Australian scincid lizards Tiliqua rugosa and T. adelaidensus (Gardner et al 2008) and the limbless lizard (Anniella alexanderae) (Wogan et al 2015), where observed diversity measures ranged from A = 7.8 to 16.4 and H E = 0.77 to 0.90.…”
The striped legless lizard, Delma impar, is a specialist grassland species restricted to south-eastern Australia. Anthropogenic influences have seen the destruction of much of its habitat and the species is threatened with extinction. Known populations of D. impar in Canberra (Australia) have recently been cleared for urban development. In 2015, Bush Heritage Australia translocated 41 individuals from these populations to Scottsdale Reserve. In this study, we completed the first population genetics analysis of D. impar in Canberra, providing a baseline for assessment of the genetic success of the translocation to Scottsdale Reserve. We analysed 154 D. impar individuals from six populations in Canberra, assessing levels of genetic diversity and differentiation within and between populations, using eight highly polymorphic microsatellite loci. High levels of genetic diversity and negligible levels of genetic differentiation were observed. Measures of allelic diversity were lower in the translocated population compared to the Canberra populations and Bayesian analysis revealed a disproportionate representation of two genetic clusters identified by STRU CTU RE between the Scottsdale Reserve and Canberra populations, indicating that the initial genetic capture failed to 'capture' recommended levels of genetic diversity to support an ongoing population. If the species successfully establishes itself at Scottsdale Reserve, the data suggests that the population should be augmented with individuals from other sites in Canberra, with the aim of increasing genetic diversity to recommended levels (i.e. > 95% genetic variation). This will maximise resilience, adaptability and long-term survival potential of the Scottsdale Reserve population of striped legless lizards from a genetic context.
“…Of the 154 striped legless lizards analysed from six Canberra populations in this study, we observed relatively high levels of genetic diversity (mean A = 11.5, mean A R = 8.9, mean H E = 0.80) as compared to other threatened reptiles that co-occur in these grassland habitats. For example, similar diversity measures (mean A = 8.8 and 14.8, mean A R = 8.4 and 11.7 and mean H E = 0.81 and 0.84) were observed in two separate studies of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) (Hoehn et al 2013;Carlson et al 2016), and in the closely related pink-tailed worm-lizard (Aprasia parapulchella) (mean A = 4.9 and H E = 0.52) (Knopp and Sarre 2012), which are both grassland specialists that inhabit native grasslands of the Australian Capital Territory (which includes the Canberra region). Levels of diversity were also comparable in the Australian Alpine Skink (Pseudemoia cryodroma) (mean A = 10.9, mean A R = 8.5 and mean H E = 0.71; Haines et al 2017) and the mountain log skink (Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii) (mean A = 12.2 and mean H E = 0.85; Stapely et al 2003) and in several more distantly related species such as the northern grass lizard (Takydromus septentrionalis) (Guo et al 2015), the "fire-specialist" lizards Amphibolorus norrisi, Ctenotus atlas, and Nephrurus stellatus (Smith et al 2011), the arboreal geckos Oedura reticulata and Gehyra variegata (Hoehn et al 2007), the Australian scincid lizards Tiliqua rugosa and T. adelaidensus (Gardner et al 2008) and the limbless lizard (Anniella alexanderae) (Wogan et al 2015), where observed diversity measures ranged from A = 7.8 to 16.4 and H E = 0.77 to 0.90.…”
The striped legless lizard, Delma impar, is a specialist grassland species restricted to south-eastern Australia. Anthropogenic influences have seen the destruction of much of its habitat and the species is threatened with extinction. Known populations of D. impar in Canberra (Australia) have recently been cleared for urban development. In 2015, Bush Heritage Australia translocated 41 individuals from these populations to Scottsdale Reserve. In this study, we completed the first population genetics analysis of D. impar in Canberra, providing a baseline for assessment of the genetic success of the translocation to Scottsdale Reserve. We analysed 154 D. impar individuals from six populations in Canberra, assessing levels of genetic diversity and differentiation within and between populations, using eight highly polymorphic microsatellite loci. High levels of genetic diversity and negligible levels of genetic differentiation were observed. Measures of allelic diversity were lower in the translocated population compared to the Canberra populations and Bayesian analysis revealed a disproportionate representation of two genetic clusters identified by STRU CTU RE between the Scottsdale Reserve and Canberra populations, indicating that the initial genetic capture failed to 'capture' recommended levels of genetic diversity to support an ongoing population. If the species successfully establishes itself at Scottsdale Reserve, the data suggests that the population should be augmented with individuals from other sites in Canberra, with the aim of increasing genetic diversity to recommended levels (i.e. > 95% genetic variation). This will maximise resilience, adaptability and long-term survival potential of the Scottsdale Reserve population of striped legless lizards from a genetic context.
“…Ensuring the resilience of urban populations requires large population sizes to maintain sufficient genetic variation for natural selection to act upon (Sgrò et al, ). Consequently, to facilitate movement between populations and promote the maintenance of genetic diversity and long‐term persistence of populations, the authors recommended the protection, rehabilitation, and connection of the lizard's grassland habitats (Hoehn et al, ). Large, diverse populations can also be achieved through strategies such as building and conserving sufficiently large parks, curbing urban sprawl, and creating dispersal corridors between populations, potentially along existing roadways and railways (Haddad, ), as well as riparian zones (Edge et al, ).…”
Section: Applications Of Urban Evolutionary Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this outcome, it will be necessary for urban scientists to redefine how they study urban ecosystems and communicate their findings to help decision-makers incorporate evolutionary insights into practice. For example, highways severely limit the dispersal of an endangered Australian lizard, Tympanocryptis pinguicolla Mitchell (earless dragon), which has resulted in the isolation and genetic differentiation of remnant populations, and declines in abundance (Hoehn, Dimond, Osborne, & Sarre, 2013). Ensuring the resilience of urban populations requires large population sizes to maintain sufficient genetic variation for natural selection to act upon (Sgrò et al, 2010).…”
Urban ecosystems are rapidly expanding throughout the world, but how urban growth affects the evolutionary ecology of species living in urban areas remains largely unknown. Urban ecology has advanced our understanding of how the development of cities and towns change environmental conditions and alter ecological processes and patterns. However, despite decades of research in urban ecology, the extent to which urbanization influences evolutionary and eco‐evolutionary change has received little attention. The nascent field of urban evolutionary ecology seeks to understand how urbanization affects the evolution of populations, and how those evolutionary changes in turn influence the ecological dynamics of populations, communities, and ecosystems. Following a brief history of this emerging field, this Perspective article provides a research agenda and roadmap for future research aimed at advancing our understanding of the interplay between ecology and evolution of urban‐dwelling organisms. We identify six key questions that, if addressed, would significantly increase our understanding of how urbanization influences evolutionary processes. These questions consider how urbanization affects nonadaptive evolution, natural selection, and convergent evolution, in addition to the role of urban environmental heterogeneity on species evolution, and the roles of phenotypic plasticity versus adaptation on species’ abundance in cities. Our final question examines the impact of urbanization on evolutionary diversification. For each of these six questions, we suggest avenues for future research that will help advance the field of urban evolutionary ecology. Lastly, we highlight the importance of integrating urban evolutionary ecology into urban planning, conservation practice, pest management, and public engagement.
“…The population sizes at several of those sites have declined since surveys began and the lizards have become undetectable in some places [43]. The populations that remain are heavily fragmented by roads, airports and other infrastructure forming genetically discrete populations in most cases [44]. A major population distributional disjunction that may pre-date the European settlement of Canberra occurs to the north and south of the Molonglo River which splits Canberra.…”
Taxonomic research is of fundamental importance in conservation management of threatened species, providing an understanding of species diversity on which management plans are based. The grassland earless dragon lizards (Agamidae:
Tympanocryptis
) of southeastern Australia have long been of conservation concern but there have been ongoing taxonomic uncertainties. We provide a comprehensive taxonomic review of this group, integrating multiple lines of evidence, including phylogeography (mtDNA), phylogenomics (SNPs), external morphology and micro X-ray CT scans. Based on these data we assign the lectotype of
T. lineata
to the Canberra region, restrict the distribution of
T. pinguicolla
to Victoria and name two new species:
T. osbornei
sp. nov. (Cooma) and
T. mccartneyi
sp. nov. (Bathurst). Our results have significant conservation implications. Of particular concern is
T. pinguicolla
, with the last confident sighting in 1969, raising the possibility of the first extinction of a reptile on mainland Australia. However, our results are equivocal as to whether
T. pinguicolla
is extant or extinct, emphasizing the immediate imperative for continued surveys to locate any remaining populations of
T. pinguicolla
. We also highlight the need for a full revision of conservation management plans for all the grassland earless dragons.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.