2018
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of efficiency traits in Austrian dairy cattle and their relationships with body condition score and lameness

Abstract: This study is part of a larger project whose overall objective was to evaluate the possibilities for genetic improvement of efficiency in Austrian dairy cattle. In 2014, a 1-yr data collection was carried out. Data from 6,519 cows kept on 161 farms were recorded. In addition to routinely recorded data (e.g., milk yield, fertility, disease data), data of novel traits [e.g., body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), lameness score, body measurements] and individual feeding information and feed quality were r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
23
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, large chest girth is associated with an increased risk for lameness (OR=1.26 [1.20;1.32]). Contrary to existing research 55,56 , animal body weight decreases the odds for lameness (OR=0.84 [0.80; 0.89]), but does not rank highly among feature importances (rank 127). The strong association of parity on the risk for lameness in our analysis (OR=2.25 [2.17; 2.33]) lies within the confidence interval reported by the meta study (OR=1.…”
Section: Lamenesscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, large chest girth is associated with an increased risk for lameness (OR=1.26 [1.20;1.32]). Contrary to existing research 55,56 , animal body weight decreases the odds for lameness (OR=0.84 [0.80; 0.89]), but does not rank highly among feature importances (rank 127). The strong association of parity on the risk for lameness in our analysis (OR=2.25 [2.17; 2.33]) lies within the confidence interval reported by the meta study (OR=1.…”
Section: Lamenesscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The recommended acceptable BCS of dairy cows ranges from 3.0 to 3.5 on a 5-point scale to ensure that health, reproduction and animal welfare are not compromised [2]. A previous study showed that cows with low BCS (LBCS) are more susceptible to metabolic diseases and claw diseases [3]. In contrast, cows with high BCS (HBCS) suffer from many metabolic disorders, such as fatty liver, oxidative stress and ketosis [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a previous study within this project showed that larger cows required more health care (Mahoney et al, 1986). In Bavaria (Germany), BS and FV cows have increased in body size over the last decades (Krogmeier, 2009). Krogmeier (2009) also found a negative relationship between body size and longevity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the USA, Holstein cows were selected directly for body size to some extent, on the assumption that larger cows are able to produce more milk (Hansen, 2000). In Bavaria (Germany), increasing body size in Fleckvieh (dual-purpose Simmental) and Brown Swiss (BS) has been negatively connected to longevity (Krogmeier, 2009). In 1966, a long-term experiment with Holstein (HF) cows at the Northwest Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, concerning cow size was initiated and resulted in several studies (e.g., Mahoney et al, 1986;Hansen et al, 1999;Becker et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%