1971
DOI: 10.2527/jas1971.334717x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Analysis of Degree of Maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
66
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
12
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, animals that were heavy at maturity tended to have a slower growth rate and be relatively smaller in BW at earlier ages. This finding is in agreement with reports by Fitzhugh and Taylor (1971) and Bathaei and Leroy (1998), and is important information for the transmission of more profitable traits for early lamb growth. Hossein-Zadeh (2015), in a study of Guilan sheep, found lowest values for the phenotypic correlations between a and k, but these were still negative according to our findings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In other words, animals that were heavy at maturity tended to have a slower growth rate and be relatively smaller in BW at earlier ages. This finding is in agreement with reports by Fitzhugh and Taylor (1971) and Bathaei and Leroy (1998), and is important information for the transmission of more profitable traits for early lamb growth. Hossein-Zadeh (2015), in a study of Guilan sheep, found lowest values for the phenotypic correlations between a and k, but these were still negative according to our findings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The RGR can be considered as an approximation of the rate of maturity applied to a short period of time and corresponds to daily gain expressed as a proportion of live weight [13].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of maturity was defined as: (slaughter weight/adult BW) × 100 (Fitzhugh and Taylor, 1971). The adult live BW for each species and breed was estimated as the average BW of adult male (58.2 ± 0.46 kg, n = 314) and female (45.1 ± 0.37 kg, n = 3201) sheep and male (57.7 ± 0.35 kg, n = 224) and female (44.6 ± 0.37 kg, n = 2206) goats belonging to the same flock and herds, respectively.…”
Section: Animals and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%