2018
DOI: 10.21307/pjm-2018-019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Analysis Method for Staphylococcus chromogenes Associated with Goat Mastitis

Abstract: Mastitis in goats is mainly caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS). The identification methods for this group are based on evaluating the expression of phenotypic characteristics such as the ability to metabolize various substrates; however, this is disadvantageous as these methods are dependent on gene expression. In recent years, genotyping methods such as the Multiple Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) and gene identification have been useful for epidemiological study of several … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we detected the presence of genes responsible for cell adhesion and immune evasion in these S. chromogenes isolates, including atl, capO, capD, adsA and sbi. Notably, genes encoding toxins, such as beta hemolysin (hlb), lipases (lip and geh) and thermonuclease (nuc), were also confirmed (S5B Fig), which have been identified in S. chromogenes-mediated mastitis of bovines and goats [29,30]. Taken together, our results indicate that both S. chromogenes and Av.…”
Section: Extensive Spread Of Multi-drug Resistant Av Paragallinarumsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we detected the presence of genes responsible for cell adhesion and immune evasion in these S. chromogenes isolates, including atl, capO, capD, adsA and sbi. Notably, genes encoding toxins, such as beta hemolysin (hlb), lipases (lip and geh) and thermonuclease (nuc), were also confirmed (S5B Fig), which have been identified in S. chromogenes-mediated mastitis of bovines and goats [29,30]. Taken together, our results indicate that both S. chromogenes and Av.…”
Section: Extensive Spread Of Multi-drug Resistant Av Paragallinarumsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Notably, genes encoding toxins, such as beta hemolysin ( hlb ), lipases ( lip and geh ) and thermonuclease ( nuc ), were also confirmed ( S5B Fig ), which have been identified in S . chromogenes -mediated mastitis of bovines and goats [ 29 , 30 ]. Taken together, our results indicate that both S .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT-PCR conditions for amplification consist of denaturation at 94 °C for 10 s, anealing at 60 °C for 15 s, and extension at 72 °C for 10 s. The whole reaction was maintained for 40 amplification cycles . The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH gene expression, and the relative gene expression was evaluated using the 2 –ΔΔCt method . The information about primers is listed in Table .…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have implicated S. chromogenes as a frequent cause of intramammary infections in cattle on dairy farms and have demonstrated strain diversity can vary within and between farms. However the DNA fragment profiling methods used in these studies to characterize strain diversity, notably PFGE, ALPF, RAPD-PCR, and MLVA, have yielded conflicting estimates of diversity, ranging from a high degree of genetic conservation to considerable genetic heterogeneity [10,11,18,19,22,23,[44][45][46][47][48][49]. Given the stand-alone nature of these studies and the incompatibility of their measures of strain diversity, the results of different studies cannot be directly compared or consolidated.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity In S Chromogenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), ribotyping, amplification fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR, and multiple locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) have been used to discriminate between S . chromogenes strains in epidemiological studies [ 10 , 11 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 23 ]; these methods demonstrate sufficient discriminatory power in short-term epidemiological investigations. However, DNA fragment electrophoretic band pattern (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%