1992
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1,799
0
51

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,336 publications
(1,851 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1,799
0
51
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, genetic operations like cross-over and muta-tion make the offspring different from their parents. This concept of the survival of the fittest, as simulated by the genetic algorithm, is a strong tool to simulate optimizing behavior (Goldberg, 1989), and is, therefore, applied to model biological and social agents (Holland and Miller, 1991;Holland, 1992;Waldrop, 1992;Janssen, 1996).…”
Section: Perspectives and Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, genetic operations like cross-over and muta-tion make the offspring different from their parents. This concept of the survival of the fittest, as simulated by the genetic algorithm, is a strong tool to simulate optimizing behavior (Goldberg, 1989), and is, therefore, applied to model biological and social agents (Holland and Miller, 1991;Holland, 1992;Waldrop, 1992;Janssen, 1996).…”
Section: Perspectives and Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holland [26] suggested that the chromosomes should be represented by binary strings. From two sets of chromosomes offspring are produced by the use of genetic operators such as crossover and mutation.…”
Section: Stochastic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large penalty factors, however, lead to ill-conditioned problems. Replacing the square term in (26) by the modulus results in the exact penalty method. Here the weighting factor can be finite (…”
Section: Treatment Of Nonlinear Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cannot be implemented in the current study since every particle represented a particular land use. However, instead of deleting the particles with lower fitness scores, half of them were optimised in the next stage using GA [39]. Without the moving characteristic in PSO, GA uses crossover and, especially, mutation, to jump over wide constraint regions.…”
Section: Optimisation Modulementioning
confidence: 99%