2007
DOI: 10.1080/10426910701323342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic-Algorithm-Based Computational Models for Optimizing the Process Parameters of A-TIG Welding to Achieve Target Bead Geometry in Type 304 L(N) and 316 L(N) Stainless Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the error values in the predicted weld bead parameters, the crossover rate was fixed at 0.76, implying that crossover was carried out only on 76 chromosomes among the 100 chromosomes, and the remaining chromosomes were carried over to the next generation without any alteration. [22] After the crossover, mutation was carried out on the offsprings in which one allele of the gene is randomly replaced by another to produce a new genetic structure. The mutation probability is kept low at a rate of 0.001 to avoid any possible perturbations.…”
Section: Selection Of Genetic Algorithm Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the error values in the predicted weld bead parameters, the crossover rate was fixed at 0.76, implying that crossover was carried out only on 76 chromosomes among the 100 chromosomes, and the remaining chromosomes were carried over to the next generation without any alteration. [22] After the crossover, mutation was carried out on the offsprings in which one allele of the gene is randomly replaced by another to produce a new genetic structure. The mutation probability is kept low at a rate of 0.001 to avoid any possible perturbations.…”
Section: Selection Of Genetic Algorithm Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar observation has been reported earlier. [22] For the purpose of experimentally validating the model, a set of process parameters is considered. The target and the actual depth of penetration, bead width, and HAZ width using the multiobjective GA model are given in Table IV.…”
Section: E Validation Of Genetic Algorithm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above optimization problem was solved using Quasi-Newton method. Vasudevan et al (2007) used a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to achieve the target bead geometry in Tungsten Inert Gas welding by optimizing the process parameters.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic principles of GA were first laid down rigorously by Holland, 19 and are well described in many texts like Deb's 20 . In GA, the initial population is the possible solution to the optimization problem and each possible solution is called an individual 10 . Each individual is represented as a binary string consisting of combinations of randomly generated 0s and 1s 21 .…”
Section: Development Of Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A binary‐coded GA with a penalty term was used to solve the said problem 9 . Vasudevan et al have developed; GA based computational models to determine the optimum/near‐optimum process parameters to achieve the target weld‐bead geometry in 304LN and 316LN stainless steel welds produced by a TIG welding 10 . Kumaran et al validated the application of GA to friction welding of tube‐to‐tube plate using an external tool process by means of computing the deviation between predicted and experimentally obtained welding process parameters 11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%