2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1665-0_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Algorithm-Based Approach for Adequate Test Data Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Search-based test data generation consists of inspecting the input domain of PUT for test data satisfying a selected test data adequacy criterion. For this reason, the focus has been on the use of metaheuristic search and evolutionary algorithms such as hill climbing, simulated annealing, tabu search, and genetic algorithms [1,[11][12][13][14]. Each of these search-based algorithms is strongly dependent on the domain of the problem under consideration because they use heuristics or knowledge related to the problem domain.…”
Section: Improvements In Rtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Search-based test data generation consists of inspecting the input domain of PUT for test data satisfying a selected test data adequacy criterion. For this reason, the focus has been on the use of metaheuristic search and evolutionary algorithms such as hill climbing, simulated annealing, tabu search, and genetic algorithms [1,[11][12][13][14]. Each of these search-based algorithms is strongly dependent on the domain of the problem under consideration because they use heuristics or knowledge related to the problem domain.…”
Section: Improvements In Rtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic test data generation is concerned with the detection of program input data satisfying a given testing criterion. Currently, path coverage is the most applicable criterion for white-box testing [1,2]. To satisfy this criterion, test data should be generated in such a way that each path could be executed at least once.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%