Generous economic investments after basolateral amygdala damage

Abstract

Contemporary economic models hold that instrumental and impulsive behaviors underlie human social decision making. The amygdala is assumed to be involved in social-economic behavior, but its role in human behavior is poorly understood. Rodent research suggests that the basolateral amygdala (BLA) subserves instrumental behaviors and regulates the central-medial amygdala, which subserves impulsive behaviors. The human amygdala, however, typically is investigated as a single unit. If these rodent data could be translated to humans, selective dysfunction of the human BLA might constrain instrumental social-economic decisions and result in more impulsive social-economic choice behavior. Here we show that humans with selective BLA damage and a functional central-medial amygdala invest nearly 100% more money in unfamiliar others in a trust game than do healthy controls. We furthermore show that this generosity is not caused by risk-taking deviations in nonsocial contexts. Moreover, these BLA-damaged subjects do not expect higher returns or perceive people as more trustworthy, implying that their generous investments are not instrumental in nature. These findings suggest that the human BLA is essential for instrumental behaviors in socialeconomic interactions.economic trust | altruism

Adult attachment style modulates neural responses in a mentalizing task

“…In rodents, BLA has been proposed to be essential for calculated instrumental behavior, such as active avoidance and incentive learning with reference to sensory-specific features (Balleine and Killcross, 2006;Choi et al, 2010). Based on studies in animals and humans, it has been put forward that BLA inhibits impulsive-affective response pathways from central-medial amygdala (CMA) to brainstem (Tye et al, 2011;van Honk et al, 2013).…”

A Translational Neuroscience Approach to Understanding the Development of Social Anxiety Disorder and Its Pathophysiology

“…Studies have been performed in patients with varying degrees of amygdala damage (61–63). Consistent with functional imaging findings, a rare human patient with bilateral damage to her entire amygdala was shown not to experience psychological discomfort in response to invasions of her personal-space (64), did not have normative distrust of strangers (65; 66), nor did she report normal fearfulness (67) – all of these features are associated with decreased AT.…”

Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: an fMRI study of trust

“…Decisions in the latter seem to involve relatively greater posterior parietal cortex activation, while the decisions in the former seem to recruit the lateral prefrontal cortex [12,22,23]. Furthermore, a recent study by Lauharatanahirun et al [24] traces differences in the source of uncertainty (social rather than non-social risk) to changes in amygdala activity [25]. While this is no doubt part of the story, behavioural evidence suggests the reason why the source of the uncertainty matters is probably the anticipated aversive emotions connected to possible betrayal of one's own trust by another human.…”