Generic Versus Specific Competencies of Entry-Level Public Health Graduates: Employers’ Perceptions in Poland, the UK, and the Netherlands

Abstract

Constant changes in society and the public health domain force public health professionals into new roles and the development of new competencies. Public health professionals will need to be trained to respond to this challenge. The aim of this comparative study among Poland, the UK and the Netherlands is to identify competence needs for Master of Public Health graduates entering the labour market from a European perspective. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to employers in the three countries, rating the importance of competency in public health on a masterÕs level. In all three countries, interpersonal competencies, like team working and communication skills, are rated as highly important. However, employers in the UK and Poland generally rate public health specific competencies as much more important than their Dutch colleagues. It is concluded that while public health specific knowledge is providing a useful starting point for entry-level public health professionals, employers increasingly recognise the value of generic competencies such as communication and team working skills. The results suggest a stronger emphasis on teaching methods that encourage active learning and the integration of skills, which is crucial for enhancing graduatesÕ employability, and foster an open attitude to multidisciplinary working, which is essential in modern health care.

A systematic program of research regarding the assessment of speech-language pathology competencies

“…These competencies align well with the current move by Australian universities towards identifying desired graduate qualities in recognition that a university education should be about more than acquiring knowledge (Barrie, 2006). Similarly they meet the need generally expressed by employers for graduates to have generic 'work ready' competencies such as the ability to communicate effectively, work in teams and be lifelong learners (Biesma et al, 2008;Hager, Holland, & Beckett, 2002).…”

Defining the Industrial and Engineering Management Professional Profile: a longitudinal study based on job advertisements

“…The formation of engineering students must consider what the professional practice is requiring, in order to bridge a gap between competences that universities are providing and competences that societies, industries and services are demanding, as described in several studies (Biesma et al, 2008;Heijde & Van Der Heijden, 2006;Hennemann & Liefner, 2010;Jackson, 2012;Marie-Emmanuelle et al, 2010;Markes, 2006;Mason et al, 2009;Stiwne & Jungert, 2010;Walther et al, 2011). In order to reduce this gap, the learning process requires innovative approaches contributing for the development of competences.…”

Using an interprofessional competency framework to examine collaborative practice

“…These authors help to identify the complexity of interprofessional education and practice by focusing on integration as a key feature and by describing elements of competencies that can be applied to the interprofessional context. Several authors are strong advocates for a competencybased approach to education (Cbe) valuing the application of learning to the workplace 20,21 . Some, however, describe limitations to competency-based education and its potentially negative effect on the broader perspectives of curriculum development and the process of learning 122,23,2 .…”