Generic Type 3 Wind Turbine Model Based on IEC 61400-27-1: Parameter Analysis and Transient Response under Voltage Dips

Lorenzo-Bonache, Alberto; Honrubia-Escribano, A.; Jiménez-Buendía, Francisco; Molina‐García, Ángel; Gómez‐Lázaro, Emilio

doi:10.3390/en10091441

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The implementation of the Type 4 WT model following the IEC or WECC guidelines is similar because both organizations use a simple CS due to the facilities provided by full-scale converter technology. This is accentuated by the lack of mechanical model or pitch control system [23]. However, the EGS differs considerably between the two models, Fig.…”

Section: Generic Type 4 Wt Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Field Validation of Generic Type 4 Wind Turbine Models Based on IEC and WECC Guidelines

Lorenzo-Bonache

Honrubia-Escribano²,

Jiménez-Buendía³

et al. 2019

IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The generic wind turbine models developed in recent years by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and the Western Electricity Coordinated Council (WECC) are intended to meet the needs of public, standard, and relatively simple (small number of parameters and computational requirements) wind turbine and wind farm models used to conduct transient stability analysis. Moreover, the full-scale converter (FSC) wind turbine technology referred to as Type 4 by IEC and WECC, is increasingly used in current power systems due to its control benefits. Hence, the development of this generic model has become a priority.This study presents the validation of two generic Type 4 wind turbine models, which have been developed in accordance with the IEC and WECC guidelines, respectively. Field data collected from a real wind turbine located in a Spanish wind farm was used to validate both generic Type 4 wind turbine models following the IEC validation guidelines. Ten different test cases are considered, varying not only the depth and duration of the faults but also the load of the wind turbine. The parameters of the models were kept constant for all the simulation cases, aiming to evaluate the accuracy of the models when facing different voltage dips.

show abstract

Section: Generic Type 4 Wt Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Field Validation of Generic Type 4 Wind Turbine Models Based on IEC and WECC Guidelines

Lorenzo-Bonache

Honrubia-Escribano²,

Jiménez-Buendía³

et al. 2019

IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…where R is the wind wheel radius, is the air density, max is defined as the maximum wind energy conversion coefficient, opt is the OTSR (optimal tip speed ratio), and the damping compensation torque T Damp is given by [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]…”

Section: Pi-type Sliding Mode Controller Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

A PI‐Type Sliding Mode Controller Design for PMSG‐Based Wind Turbine

Zhou

Zhao

et al. 2019

Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because the PMSG (permanent magnet synchronous generator)-based WECS (wind energy conversion system) has some uncertainties, the conventional control strategy with poor robustness is sometimes difficult to meet the performance requirements of control. In order to ensure efficient and stability of the system, this paper proposed a novel PI (proportional-integral)-type SMC (sliding mode control) strategy for PMSG-based WECS uncertainties and presented the detailed analysis and design process. Compared with the conventional control method, the PI-type SMC proposed in this paper not only can make the closed-loop system globally stable, but also has a better robustness and slightly reduced the current ripple and distortion. Finally, the simulation results verify the correctness and effectiveness of this algorithm.

show abstract

“…Residual voltage (minimum value of voltage) and dip duration are the two parameters that characterize these types of disturbances in the grid. However, the complexity of WTs means that not all kinds of voltage dips are suitable to be conducted on actual WTs, and, hence, IEC 61400-21 established a representative set of disturbances in order to validate a WT model [17].…”

Section: Validation Of Generic Models Based On Iec 61400-27-1 Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In particular, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there are few studies in the scientific literature regarding the implementation and simulation of the generic Type 3 WT model in specialized electrical engineering software tools such as DIgSILENT-PowerFactory. For instance, works such as [16] or [17] analyze the behavior of the active and reactive power control systems of the standard Type 3 WT and its transient response when subjected to voltage dips, respectively. In both cases, MATLAB is the only simulation tool used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of IEC 61400-27-1 Type 3 Model: Performance Analysis under Different Modeling Approaches

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forecasts for 2023 position wind energy as the third-largest renewable energy source in the world. This rapid growth brings with it the need to conduct transient stability studies to plan network operation activities and analyze the integration of wind power into the grid, where generic wind turbine models have emerged as the optimal solution. In this study, the generic Type 3 wind turbine model developed by Standard IEC 61400-27-1 was submitted to two voltage dips and implemented in two simulation tools: MATLAB/Simulink and DIgSILENT-PowerFactory. Since the Standard states that the responses of the models are independent of the software used, the active and reactive power results of both responses were compared following the IEC validation guidelines, finding, nevertheless, slight differences dependent on the specific features of each simulation software. The behavior of the generic models was assessed, and their responses were also compared with field measurements of an actual wind turbine in operation. Validation errors calculated were comprehensively analyzed, and the differences in the implementation processes of both software tools are highlighted. The outcomes obtained help to further establish the limitations of the generic wind turbine models, thus achieving a more widespread use of Standard IEC 61400-27-1.

show abstract

Generic Type 3 Wind Turbine Model Based on IEC 61400-27-1: Parameter Analysis and Transient Response under Voltage Dips

Cited by 21 publications

References 25 publications

Field Validation of Generic Type 4 Wind Turbine Models Based on IEC and WECC Guidelines

Field Validation of Generic Type 4 Wind Turbine Models Based on IEC and WECC Guidelines

A PI‐Type Sliding Mode Controller Design for PMSG‐Based Wind Turbine

Implementation of IEC 61400-27-1 Type 3 Model: Performance Analysis under Different Modeling Approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About