Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
During the last five decades, many different secondary constructions of bent functions were proposed in the literature. Nevertheless, apart from a few works, the question about the class inclusion of bent functions generated using these methods is rarely addressed. Especially, if such a “new” family belongs to the completed Maiorana–McFarland ($${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # ) class then there is no proper contribution to the theory of bent functions. In this article, we provide some fundamental results related to the inclusion in $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # and eventually we obtain many infinite families of bent functions that are provably outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . The fact that a bent function f is in/outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if and only if its dual is in/outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # is employed in the so-called 4-decomposition of a bent function on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^n$$ F 2 n , which was originally considered by Canteaut and Charpin (IEEE Trans Inf Theory 49(8):2004–2019, 2003) in terms of the second-order derivatives and later reformulated in (Hodžić et al. in IEEE Trans Inf Theory 65(11):7554–7565, 2019) in terms of the duals of its restrictions to the cosets of an $$(n-2)$$ ( n - 2 ) -dimensional subspace V. For each of the three possible cases of this 4-decomposition of a bent function (all four restrictions being bent, semi-bent, or 5-valued spectra functions), we provide generic methods for designing bent functions provably outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . For instance, for the elementary case of defining a bent function $$h(\textbf{x},y_1,y_2)=f(\textbf{x}) \oplus y_1y_2$$ h ( x , y 1 , y 2 ) = f ( x ) ⊕ y 1 y 2 on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^{n+2}$$ F 2 n + 2 using a bent function f on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^n$$ F 2 n , we show that h is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if and only if f is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . This approach is then generalized to the case when two bent functions are used. More precisely, the concatenation $$f_1||f_1||f_2||(1\oplus f_2)$$ f 1 | | f 1 | | f 2 | | ( 1 ⊕ f 2 ) also gives bent functions outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if $$f_1$$ f 1 or $$f_2$$ f 2 is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . The cases when the four restrictions of a bent function are semi-bent or 5-valued spectra functions are also considered and several design methods of constructing infinite families of bent functions outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # are provided.
During the last five decades, many different secondary constructions of bent functions were proposed in the literature. Nevertheless, apart from a few works, the question about the class inclusion of bent functions generated using these methods is rarely addressed. Especially, if such a “new” family belongs to the completed Maiorana–McFarland ($${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # ) class then there is no proper contribution to the theory of bent functions. In this article, we provide some fundamental results related to the inclusion in $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # and eventually we obtain many infinite families of bent functions that are provably outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . The fact that a bent function f is in/outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if and only if its dual is in/outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # is employed in the so-called 4-decomposition of a bent function on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^n$$ F 2 n , which was originally considered by Canteaut and Charpin (IEEE Trans Inf Theory 49(8):2004–2019, 2003) in terms of the second-order derivatives and later reformulated in (Hodžić et al. in IEEE Trans Inf Theory 65(11):7554–7565, 2019) in terms of the duals of its restrictions to the cosets of an $$(n-2)$$ ( n - 2 ) -dimensional subspace V. For each of the three possible cases of this 4-decomposition of a bent function (all four restrictions being bent, semi-bent, or 5-valued spectra functions), we provide generic methods for designing bent functions provably outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . For instance, for the elementary case of defining a bent function $$h(\textbf{x},y_1,y_2)=f(\textbf{x}) \oplus y_1y_2$$ h ( x , y 1 , y 2 ) = f ( x ) ⊕ y 1 y 2 on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^{n+2}$$ F 2 n + 2 using a bent function f on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^n$$ F 2 n , we show that h is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if and only if f is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . This approach is then generalized to the case when two bent functions are used. More precisely, the concatenation $$f_1||f_1||f_2||(1\oplus f_2)$$ f 1 | | f 1 | | f 2 | | ( 1 ⊕ f 2 ) also gives bent functions outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if $$f_1$$ f 1 or $$f_2$$ f 2 is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . The cases when the four restrictions of a bent function are semi-bent or 5-valued spectra functions are also considered and several design methods of constructing infinite families of bent functions outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # are provided.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.