Explicit infinite families of bent functions outside the completed Maiorana–McFarland class

Abstract

During the last five decades, many different secondary constructions of bent functions were proposed in the literature. Nevertheless, apart from a few works, the question about the class inclusion of bent functions generated using these methods is rarely addressed. Especially, if such a “new” family belongs to the completed Maiorana–McFarland ($${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # ) class then there is no proper contribution to the theory of bent functions. In this article, we provide some fundamental results related to the inclusion in $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # and eventually we obtain many infinite families of bent functions that are provably outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . The fact that a bent function f is in/outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if and only if its dual is in/outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # is employed in the so-called 4-decomposition of a bent function on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^n$$ F 2 n , which was originally considered by Canteaut and Charpin (IEEE Trans Inf Theory 49(8):2004–2019, 2003) in terms of the second-order derivatives and later reformulated in (Hodžić et al. in IEEE Trans Inf Theory 65(11):7554–7565, 2019) in terms of the duals of its restrictions to the cosets of an $$(n-2)$$ ( n - 2 ) -dimensional subspace V. For each of the three possible cases of this 4-decomposition of a bent function (all four restrictions being bent, semi-bent, or 5-valued spectra functions), we provide generic methods for designing bent functions provably outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . For instance, for the elementary case of defining a bent function $$h(\textbf{x},y_1,y_2)=f(\textbf{x}) \oplus y_1y_2$$ h ( x , y 1 , y 2 ) = f ( x ) ⊕ y 1 y 2 on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^{n+2}$$ F 2 n + 2 using a bent function f on $${\mathbb {F}}_2^n$$ F 2 n , we show that h is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if and only if f is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . This approach is then generalized to the case when two bent functions are used. More precisely, the concatenation $$f_1||f_1||f_2||(1\oplus f_2)$$ f 1 | | f 1 | | f 2 | | ( 1 ⊕ f 2 ) also gives bent functions outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # if $$f_1$$ f 1 or $$f_2$$ f 2 is outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # . The cases when the four restrictions of a bent function are semi-bent or 5-valued spectra functions are also considered and several design methods of constructing infinite families of bent functions outside $${{{\mathcal {M}}}{{\mathcal {M}}}}^\#$$ M M # are provided.

Bent functions satisfying the dual bent condition and permutations with the $$(\mathcal {A}_m)$$ property

“…Conversely, as shown in [2], any bent function on F n+2 2 can be decomposed into four subfunctions f i ∈ F n 2 , where all f i are bent, disjoint spectra semi-bent functions or suitable 5-valued spectra functions. The latter two cases have been recently analyzed in [18], where efficient methods of designing bent functions outside M # were proposed. For a concatenation of four bent functions f = f 1 || f 2 || f 3 || f 4 , the necessary and sufficient condition that f is bent is that the dual bent condition is satisfied [13, Theorem III.1], i.e., f *…”