2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00715-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic antiarrhythmics are not therapeutically equivalent for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias11∗Disclosure: This study was not written with support from or discussion with any pharmaceutical manufacturer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, arrhythmia control was re-established when the patients were switched back to the trade-name drug [ 2 , 3 ]. These results can be attributed partly to differences in drug absorption as BE studies were performed in healthy volunteers while these older studies enrolled some post-myocardial patients in whom gastrointestinal absorption is altered [ 134 ].…”
Section: Generic Substitution Of Brand-name Aads With a Narrow Timentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, arrhythmia control was re-established when the patients were switched back to the trade-name drug [ 2 , 3 ]. These results can be attributed partly to differences in drug absorption as BE studies were performed in healthy volunteers while these older studies enrolled some post-myocardial patients in whom gastrointestinal absorption is altered [ 134 ].…”
Section: Generic Substitution Of Brand-name Aads With a Narrow Timentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in a study about propafenone, Amit et al [ 1 ] reported that the generic formulation was found to be at least as safe and effective as the brand formulation with regard to atrial fibrillation recurrence, emergency room and hospital admissions, and necessity for concomitant therapy [ 5 ]. Another report evaluated the risk of thyroid dysfunction between patients using brand name versus generic formulations of amiodarone and found no difference in terms of incidence of thyroid dysfunction [ 6 ]. In general, however, there is little evidence of important clinical differences between generic and brand-name drugs in cardiovascular disease [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Naranjo probability scale, we documented an association between the generic drug and the development of atrial fibrillation, and we demonstrated in this case that a switch from the generic formulation of atenolol to the Tenormin ® -based therapy resulted in the improvement of symptoms, with an increase in plasma atenolol values. As other articles have suggested a difference in the clinical efficacy of the generic drug with respect to the brand formulations,[ 13 14 15 16 ] in recent times, a retrospective study performed in Italy has reported that off-patent generic drugs have the same efficacy as the brand formulation. [ 17 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%