Generational Perspectives on Technology's Role in Mental Health Care: A Survey of Adults With Lived Mental Health Experience

Abstract

IntroductionPersonal technology (e.g., smartphones, wearable health devices) has been leveraged extensively for mental health purposes, with upwards of 20,000 mobile applications on the market today and has been considered an important implementation strategy to overcome barriers many people face in accessing mental health care. The main question yet to be addressed is the role consumers feel technology should play in their care. One underserved demographic often ignored in this discussion are people over the age of 60. The population of adults 60 and older is predicted to double by 2,050 signaling a need to address how older adults view technology for their mental health care.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to better understand why digital mental health tools are not as broadly adopted as predicted, what role people with lived mental health experience feel technology should play in their care and how those results compare across age groups.MethodIn a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed results from a one-time cross-sectional survey that included 998 adults aged 18–83 with lived experience of mental health concerns recruited from Prolific, an online research platform. We surveyed participant's use of technology including their perspectives on using technology in conjunction with their mental health care. We asked participants about their previous use of digital mental health tools, their treatment preferences for mental health care, and the role technology should play in their mental health care.ResultsAcross all age groups, respondents had favorable views of using digital mental health for managing mental health care. However, older adults rated their acceptability of digital mental health tools lower than middle-aged and younger adults. When asked what role technology should play in mental health care in an open-ended response, most participants responded that technology should play a complementary role in mental health care (723/954, 75.8%).ConclusionDigital mental health is seen as a valuable care management tool across all age groups, but preferences for its role in care remain largely administrative and supportive. Future development of digital mental health should reflect these preferences.

Effectiveness of Mental Health Apps for Distress During COVID-19 in US Unemployed and Essential Workers: Remote Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

“…We used similar questions to those in the US Census categories [ 40 ]. This survey has been used successfully in other online studies [ 4 , 41 ]. See Multimedia Appendix 1 .…”

Perspective Chapter: From the Boom to Gen Z – Has Depression Changed across Generations?

“…While technology grants them access to information and social networks, it also exposes them to cyberbullying, unrealistic comparisons, and the pressure to maintain an online persona. This dual reality can contribute to heightened Depression and diminished self-esteem [6,20,21]. Millennials entered the job market amidst periods of uncertainty, facing challenges such as student loan debt and underemployment.…”

“…Cyberbullying threatens Generation Z as their reliance on interactions makes them more susceptible to hurtful behavior facilitated by digital anonymity. Consequently, this exacerbates the mental struggles faced by this generation [6,16,20,21,24,25].…”

Message-based psychotherapy for older adults: A cohort comparison study

“…Despite the promise of DMHIs in diminishing inequities of mental health care provision, however, it is unclear how older adults in particular engage and respond to these formats, and some surveys suggest they may be less amenable to this type of care ( 32 ). As DMHIs increase in popularity, older adults may be unintentionally excluded due to several barriers including lack of awareness, internet access, digital tools, technological socialization and education, physiological accessibility, and communication technology infrastructure.…”

“…The aim of this study was to conduct a naturalistic longitudinal observation of depressed and anxious older adults (55+) and a matched cohort of younger adults (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) seeking treatment from a large asynchronous telemedicine provider. We first compared patterns of treatment engagement across groups by examining treatment retention and average number of words and messages used by patients for the duration of time they chose to engage with the platform.…”