Effectiveness of Mental Health Apps for Distress During COVID-19 in US Unemployed and Essential Workers: Remote Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, the general public was concerned about the mental health impacts of unemployment due to COVID-19 and the stress essential workers experienced during this time. Several reports indicated that people in distress were turning to digital technology, but there was little evidence about the impact of these tools on mitigating distress. Objective This study seeks to determine the acceptability, feasibility, usability, and effectiveness of mobile mental health apps for decreasing mental health symptoms in essential workers and unemployed individuals with suicide risk. Methods We recruited participants who indicated that they were unemployed because of COVID-19 or were COVID-19–designated essential workers. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 free commercial mobile apps for managing distress that were (1) highly rated by PsyberGuide and (2) met the criteria for intervention features these participants indicated were desirable in a previous survey. Participants used the apps for 4 weeks and completed baseline and 4-week self-assessments of depression, anxiety emotional regulation, and suicide risk. Results We found no differences between the apps in any outcome but did find significant changes in depression and anxiety over time (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-9: estimate=–1.5, SE 0.2, 95% CI –1.1 to –1.8, P<.001; Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale [GAD]-7: estimate=–1.3, SE 0.2, 95% CI –1.0 to –1.6, P<.001). We found no significant changes in suicidal behavior (Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised [SBQ-R]) or emotional regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form [DERS-SF]) for the 4 weeks. We did find a significant dose-response pattern for changes in depression and anxiety. Using the app at least once a week resulted in greater improvements in treatment conditions over time on depression (estimate=–0.6, SE 0.2, 95% CI 1.0-0.2, P=.003) and anxiety (estimate=0.1, SE 0.2, 95% CI 0.4-0.6, P=.78). There was no association between app frequency and changes in suicidal behavior (SBQ-R) or emotional regulation (DERS-SF). We further found a significant difference between the conditions with regard to app usability, with the control app being the most usable (meanBeautiful Mood 72.9, SD 16.7; meanCOVID Coach 71.2, SD 15.4; meanCalm 66.8, SD 17.3; mean7 Cups 65.2, SD 17.7). We found no significant differences for app acceptability or appropriateness. Conclusions Few studies have evaluated prospectively the utility and usability of commercial apps for mood. This study found that free, self-guided commercial mobile mental health apps are seen as usable, but no one app is superior to the other. Although we found that regular use is indicated for effects on depression and anxiety to occur in those who are more symptomatic, regression to the mean cannot be ruled out. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04536935; https://tinyurl.com/mr36zx3s

Efficacy of BrighterSide, a Self-Guided App for Suicidal Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial

“…The average of the appropriateness scales was 3.63 (SD 0.89) on a range of 1 to 5, indicating that the participants’ response to the app was positively skewed. This result is consistent with another mental health–oriented app using this same measure, which returned an average of 3.6 [ 21 ]; these authors regarded this as an indication of appropriateness. Each question on the DWAI averaged a response between 2.11 and 3.28 across all participants, on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (completely), suggesting that typically, participants indicated they somewhat to mostly agreed with each statement.…”