2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of novel semantic representations in aging and Alzheimer’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, deterioration in the heteromodal association cortices (Grossman et al, 2003) may have entailed difficulties to integrate multiple features into a coherent concept, leading to a dramatically impoverished semantic representation of new words, especially in patients with AD. For instance, the ability to combine two nouns to identify a new concept (e.g., "tiger lily") was shown to be compromised in AD patients, probably due to difficulties for selecting and integrating the semantic features that are intertwined within concepts (Taler, Kousaie, Phillips, Chertkow, & Titone, 2011). By presenting the participants with new words and asking them about their semantic content through three tasks with increasing difficulty levels, our purpose was mainly to tax semantic knowledge rather than lexical access, contrary to naming tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, deterioration in the heteromodal association cortices (Grossman et al, 2003) may have entailed difficulties to integrate multiple features into a coherent concept, leading to a dramatically impoverished semantic representation of new words, especially in patients with AD. For instance, the ability to combine two nouns to identify a new concept (e.g., "tiger lily") was shown to be compromised in AD patients, probably due to difficulties for selecting and integrating the semantic features that are intertwined within concepts (Taler, Kousaie, Phillips, Chertkow, & Titone, 2011). By presenting the participants with new words and asking them about their semantic content through three tasks with increasing difficulty levels, our purpose was mainly to tax semantic knowledge rather than lexical access, contrary to naming tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%