2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13224590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of High-Precision Ground Penetrating Radar Images Using Improved Least Square Generative Adversarial Networks

Abstract: Deep learning models have achieved success in image recognition and have shown great potential for interpretation of ground penetrating radar (GPR) data. However, training reliable deep learning models requires massive labeled data, which are usually not easy to obtain due to the high costs of data acquisition and field validation. This paper proposes an improved least square generative adversarial networks (LSGAN) model which employs the loss functions of LSGAN and convolutional neural networks (CNN) to gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will even cover up effective signals. 2D GPR is not intuitive for imaging underground targets and can interfere with data processors' analysis to interpret information about the subsurface problem [11]. And the 2D radar images of some underground structures (such as trenches and pipes) are very similar to the 2D radar images of underground cavities, which can easily cause the problem of uncertainty of multiple different interpretations of the same radar image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will even cover up effective signals. 2D GPR is not intuitive for imaging underground targets and can interfere with data processors' analysis to interpret information about the subsurface problem [11]. And the 2D radar images of some underground structures (such as trenches and pipes) are very similar to the 2D radar images of underground cavities, which can easily cause the problem of uncertainty of multiple different interpretations of the same radar image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the issue of insufficient real GPR images for network training, generative adversarial networks (GANs) 16 provide a new idea for generating GPR images. Yue et al 17 proposed an improved least squares generative adversarial network (LSGAN) model for generation of high-precision GPR images to address the scarcity of labeled GPR data. They verified that the inclusion of LSGAN-generated images in the training GPR dataset could increase the target diversity and improve the detection precision by 10% compared with the model trained on the dataset containing 500 field GPR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 As a consequence, the generated images could be exactly the same as the real ones, and their diversity was decreased. 17 Another common method is to use the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) 20 to generate synthesized GPR images. The simulated data generated by FDTD simulations have underground model labels, and the simulation can generate simulated data in a variety of scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other traditional non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, ground penetrating radar (GPR) has been widely used in the detection of hidden defects due to its advantage of high-efficiency, high-resolution, and portability [4]. However, manual interpretation of GPR data is both time and labor consuming, especially for large amounts of field GPR data [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%