2008
DOI: 10.1039/b801707g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of cationic indenyl silylamide gadolinium and scandium complexes [(Ind)Ln{N(SiMe3)2}]+[B(C6F5)4]− and their reactivity for 1,3-butadiene polymerization

Abstract: Highly efficient cis-polymerization of butadiene was achieved by using new bis(indenyl) silylamide rare earth complexes with the cooperation of both a borate salt and i-Bu3Al; treatment of these complexes with organoboron compounds unexpectedly yielded new cationic mono(indenyl) amido species relevant to polymerization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a clear identification of the active species was not successful so far, due to the paramagnetic character of most of the lanthanide ions and the low tendency of the active species toward crystallization, active species elucidation remains challenging. A reasonable interpretation of this polymerization behavior seems to be that solvent [4,5,13,37], pre-reaction side products (e.g., Ph 3 CMe (A) and PhNMe 2 (B): Ln(III)-arene coordination) [38][39][40], or even anion coordination (e.g., via Ln(III)-F interactions) [41] come into play. Furthermore, dimerization might take place or a η 2 -to-η 3 coordination switch of the remaining tetramethylaluminate moiety, which tendency seems more pronounced for the larger lanthanides as found for the neutral precatalysts [4,10,12].…”
Section: Polymers Obtained At Standard Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a clear identification of the active species was not successful so far, due to the paramagnetic character of most of the lanthanide ions and the low tendency of the active species toward crystallization, active species elucidation remains challenging. A reasonable interpretation of this polymerization behavior seems to be that solvent [4,5,13,37], pre-reaction side products (e.g., Ph 3 CMe (A) and PhNMe 2 (B): Ln(III)-arene coordination) [38][39][40], or even anion coordination (e.g., via Ln(III)-F interactions) [41] come into play. Furthermore, dimerization might take place or a η 2 -to-η 3 coordination switch of the remaining tetramethylaluminate moiety, which tendency seems more pronounced for the larger lanthanides as found for the neutral precatalysts [4,10,12].…”
Section: Polymers Obtained At Standard Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that this represents the first example of [Ph 3 C] + abstracting a Cp-type p ligand rather than a s-alkyl ligand. [20] can abstract a pbonded indenyl ligand rather than a s-alkyl ligand. The abstraction pathway is influenced by the substituents on the indenyl ligands, and can be controlled by employing different indenyl ligands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher conversion and better control molecular weight by using the more bulky bis(indenyl) silylamide rare‐earth metal complex (2‐Ph‐Ind) 2 Gd[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] ( 56 ) was reported by Tardif, and high cis ‐,4‐PBD (>99 %) was obtained. Conversely, for the analogous complex 57 , a lower cis ‐1,4‐selectivity was found …”
Section: Stereoselective Polymerization Of Conjugated Dienesmentioning
confidence: 99%