2009
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200802220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indenyl Abstraction versus Alkyl Abstraction of [(Indenyl)ScR2(thf)] by [Ph3C] [B(C6F5)4]: Aspecific and Syndiospecific Styrene Polymerization

Abstract: Controlled abstraction: [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] is best known for its excellent ability to abstract alkyl ligands, however, the present study on mono(indenyl)–Sc–dialkyl/[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] systems has found that [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] can abstract a π‐bonded indenyl ligand rather than a σ‐alkyl ligand (see scheme). The abstraction pathway can be controlled by changing the substituents on the indenyl ligands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(15 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More remarkably, with increased styrene loading from 250 to 1000 equiv, an activity up to 6.24×10 3 kg (mol Lu h) −1 was reached, which was comparable to the most active titanium and scandium systems reported (Table 1, runs 2–4) 5. 6d, 20 The resultant polystyrene retained its pure syndiotacticity ( rrrr >99 %), and the molecular weights increased linearly with the ratios, whilst the molecular weight distribution remained almost unchanged ( M w / M n =1.88–1.98). As far as we are aware, complex 1 represents the first lutetium‐based active species for syndiospecific styrene polymerization with outstanding activity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…More remarkably, with increased styrene loading from 250 to 1000 equiv, an activity up to 6.24×10 3 kg (mol Lu h) −1 was reached, which was comparable to the most active titanium and scandium systems reported (Table 1, runs 2–4) 5. 6d, 20 The resultant polystyrene retained its pure syndiotacticity ( rrrr >99 %), and the molecular weights increased linearly with the ratios, whilst the molecular weight distribution remained almost unchanged ( M w / M n =1.88–1.98). As far as we are aware, complex 1 represents the first lutetium‐based active species for syndiospecific styrene polymerization with outstanding activity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Thanks to the invention of the half‐sandwich titanium catalyst that realizes high catalytic activity and syndioselectivity for styrene polymerization . Since then, extensive studies have been devoted to develop efficient “single‐site” catalytic systems for stereospecific polymerization of styrene and its derivatives, and various homogeneous metallocene, half‐metallocene, and non‐metallocene group 3 and 4 metal‐based catalysts have been invented . In the meantime, syndiotactic polystyrene derivatives bearing polar groups such as halogen, alkoxyl, aminoalkyl, and methylthio etc., that provide polymers with improved surface properties, adhesive properties, affinity for dyes, and compatibility with other polar polymers, have been successfully prepared …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar monocyclopentadienyl scandium complexes with benzyl groups (254) or borohydride groups (255) and those with different silyl groups on the Cp group (256) are also effective. The polymerization by using the indenyl scandium complex (65) affords syndiotactic and/or atactic polystyrene depending on the substituents on the indenyl group (257). The complex with R 1 = R 3 = SiMe 3 , R 2 = H affords the syndiotactic polymer, where the active species is the cationic indenyl Sc complex.…”
Section: Syndiospecific Polymerization Of Styrenementioning
confidence: 99%