2002
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2002.800611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of anisotropic-smoothness regularization filters for EIT

Abstract: Abstract-In the inverse conductivity problem, as in any illposed inverse problem, regularization techniques are necessary in order to stabilize inversion. A common way to implement regularization in electrical impedance tomography is to use Tikhonov regularization. The inverse problem is formulated as a minimization of two terms: the mismatch of the measurements against the model, and the regularization functional. Most commonly, differential operators are used as regularization functionals, leading to smooth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant improvement in the stability and accuracy of the reconstruction process can be obtained through MRI segmented anatomical information as an input to the NIR parameter estimation problem. However, the way in which the prior information is used is critical (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Misguided constraints can lead to errors that are detrimental to the image outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant improvement in the stability and accuracy of the reconstruction process can be obtained through MRI segmented anatomical information as an input to the NIR parameter estimation problem. However, the way in which the prior information is used is critical (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Misguided constraints can lead to errors that are detrimental to the image outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach also enables incorporating prior structural information, so that preferential directions of change of EP can be embedded into the regularization (e.g. [18], [19]). In general we believe that the approach developed here has advantages over algorithms based directly on (2) since it does not require differentiation of .…”
Section: Agnetic Resonance-electrical Prop-erties Tomography (Mr-ept)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse formulation developed here enables one to select regularization functionals that are appropriate for the problem at hand. Besides TV and similar edge-preserving techniques it is possible to envision using ad-hoc functionals that incorporate prior structural information extracted from other anatomic MR images [18], [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As constant conductivity values are easily obtained in EIT the null space does not diminish the regularizing properties of this choice of G. Similarly one could choose a first order differential operator for L [152]. Other smooth choices of G include the inverse of a Gaussian smoothing filter [16], effectively an infinite order differential operator. In these cases where G is smooth and for α large enough the Hessian of f will be positive definite, we can then deduce that f is a convex function [160, Ch 2], so that a critical point will be a strict local minimum, guaranteeing the success of smooth optimization methods.…”
Section: Regularizing Eitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LU factorization would be one alternative, perhaps a better choice is to use the Generalized Singular Value Decomposition GSVD [72], which allows the regularized solution to be calculated efficiently for any value of α. The GSVD is now a standard tool for understanding the effect of the choice of the regularization matrix L in a linear ill-conditioned problem, and has been applied to linearized EIT [152,16]. The use of a single linearized Tikhonov regularized solution is widespread in medical industrial and geophysical EIT, the NOSER algorithm [35] being a well known example.…”
Section: Linearized Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%