2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Seismic Active Thrust on a Retaining Wall with Submerged Backfill Using a Modified Pseudodynamic Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the so-called modified pseudo-dynamic excitation, the soil medium is simulated as a visco-elastic material by means of the well-defined Kelvin-Voigt model so as to account for the influence of damping ratio in the mobilized shear stress formulations. In this regard, the seismic horizontal acceleration coefficient acting on the centroid of each element is determined by the following modified pseudo-dynamic function to represent the shear waves propagating vertically through the soil (porous) medium [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]58 :…”
Section: Modified Pseudo-dynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the so-called modified pseudo-dynamic excitation, the soil medium is simulated as a visco-elastic material by means of the well-defined Kelvin-Voigt model so as to account for the influence of damping ratio in the mobilized shear stress formulations. In this regard, the seismic horizontal acceleration coefficient acting on the centroid of each element is determined by the following modified pseudo-dynamic function to represent the shear waves propagating vertically through the soil (porous) medium [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]58 :…”
Section: Modified Pseudo-dynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was extensively employed by several researchers in subsequent studies. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] A current limitation of the conventional pseudo-dynamic method is that it does not consider the effect of soil damping and the traction-free surface condition. Furthermore, in all the previous modified pseudo-dynamic analyses, the damping ratio of the soil deposit has been deemed to be constant with depth, which is discernibly incompatible with the fundamental compression implications and laboratory/field test results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nonlinear twin-shear rock masses, the corresponding 3D closed-form expressions of the foregoing ψ-functions are obtained as follows [28]:…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choudhury and Nimbalkar [5] considered primary wave velocity (v p ) and vertical seismic acceleration (k v g) based on the pseudodynamic method developed by Steedman and Zeng [3] to study the seismic earth pressures on retaining walls. Many other researchers have conducted detailed studies using the pseudodynamic method, assuming the failure surface of the backfill to be planar [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%