2016 International Conference on Information &Amp; Communication Technology and Systems (ICTS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icts.2016.7910298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Regression Neural Network for predicting traffic flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed the inefficiency of Webster's method to handle oversaturated traffic. Ali et al [114] combined fuzzy logic and the Webster optimum cycle formula, showing an increase of the average waiting time by (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)% relative to MaxPressure and fixedtime, respectively. Considering intersection delay, fuel consumption levels, and emissions, Calle-Laguna et al [115] applied Webster's method to estimate the optimum cycle length and eventually found an overestimation of the method.…”
Section: Webster's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed the inefficiency of Webster's method to handle oversaturated traffic. Ali et al [114] combined fuzzy logic and the Webster optimum cycle formula, showing an increase of the average waiting time by (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)% relative to MaxPressure and fixedtime, respectively. Considering intersection delay, fuel consumption levels, and emissions, Calle-Laguna et al [115] applied Webster's method to estimate the optimum cycle length and eventually found an overestimation of the method.…”
Section: Webster's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al [28] used an RBFNN for short-term freeway traffic volume prediction, with results topping around 64.81% and 91.39%, with forecast traffic volumes being in the 10% and 20% error range, respectively. The prediction accuracy was improved by combining fuzzy C-means with an RBFNN and using a Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) following the work of Park [29], Kuang et al [30], and Buliali et al [31]. On top of the GRNN, Buliali et al used a Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) method to determine the suitable smoothing factor in order to to avoid overfitting, achieving an RMSE of 16.4.…”
Section: Radial Basis Function Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a small number of sample data, GRNN also has a good prediction effect, and it can be used to deal with unstable data. The three ANNs have been widely used in data modeling and prediction [30]- [31]. Raza and Mithulananthan et al [32] used the Elman network to build an ensemble forecast framework (ENFF) for demand prediction of anomalous days.…”
Section: Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model demonstrated its better approximation capability by outperforming RBFNN and BPNN in the conducted experiments. A similar model to the GRNN model of Leng et al (2013) was also applied and achieved promising results (Buliali, Hariadi, Saikhu, & Mamase, 2016).…”
Section: Radial Basis Function Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%