2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized master curve procedure for elastomer friction taking into account dependencies on velocity, temperature and normal force

Abstract: In the sliding contact of elastomer on a rigid substrate, the coefficient of friction may depend on a large number of system and loading parameters, including normal force, sliding velocity, shape of contacting bodies, surface roughness and so on. It was argued earlier that the contact configuration is determined more immediately through the indentation depth than the normal force, and thus the indentation depth can be considered as one of "robust governing parameters" of friction. Both models of friction of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plate was rotated to control the sliding speed, meanwhile, F z was maintained to be an almost constant. Considering that μ relies on normal contact stress [ 54 ] and elastomer thickness, we prepared two elastomer discs of thicknesses t = 0.4 and 1.3 mm, representing the thickness of the elastomer in the architected materials, which varies along the rod. The corresponding applied normal forces are F z = 1.1 and 3.0 N respectively, to ensure the nominal normal contact stress acted on the steel sphere approaches the average normal stress applied to the rods, about 0.53 MPa according to the finite element method (FEM) simulations (for details see Figure S3 b and Figure S4 , Supporting Information), where the constitutive behavior of the silicone elastomer is assumed to follow the third order Ogden hyperelastic model [ 55 ] (see Section 4 and Figure S5 , Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plate was rotated to control the sliding speed, meanwhile, F z was maintained to be an almost constant. Considering that μ relies on normal contact stress [ 54 ] and elastomer thickness, we prepared two elastomer discs of thicknesses t = 0.4 and 1.3 mm, representing the thickness of the elastomer in the architected materials, which varies along the rod. The corresponding applied normal forces are F z = 1.1 and 3.0 N respectively, to ensure the nominal normal contact stress acted on the steel sphere approaches the average normal stress applied to the rods, about 0.53 MPa according to the finite element method (FEM) simulations (for details see Figure S3 b and Figure S4 , Supporting Information), where the constitutive behavior of the silicone elastomer is assumed to follow the third order Ogden hyperelastic model [ 55 ] (see Section 4 and Figure S5 , Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study also attracts attention of researchers to the fact that at small contact area the statistics of the contact profile is not the same as that of the full rough surface. This dependence maybe the reason for the weak dependency of the coefficient of friction of elastomer materials on the normal load [Popov et al (2018)].…”
Section: Contact Response Of Rough Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various elastomers, rubber is the material that has received the most attention in various practical applications (e.g., tires, seals, and shoes). Since the study done by Grosch (1963) showing the master curve of friction coefficient according to Williams-Landel-Ferry (WLF) theory (Williams et al, 1955), the importance of viscoelasticity has been recognized, and the dependence of the friction coefficient on temperature and velocity has been investigated [e.g., Popov et al (2018)]. More recently, several swollen polymers showing high elasticity and ultra-low friction (e.g., hydrogels and polymer brushes) have been found (Gong et al, 2001;Nomura et al, 2011), some of which are being developed toward practical applications (Belin et al, 2018;Tadokoro et al, 2020), and their tribological properties have also been discussed in relation to their viscoelastic properties (Mizukami et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%