2004
DOI: 10.2514/1.13097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Analytical Solar Radiation Pressure Modeling Algorithm for Spacecraft of Complex Shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For box-wing-type SRP models (Rodríguez-Solano, 2014a) the satellite is described by a small number of surfaces, while Ziebart (2004) established a more complex handling of SRP by finite element representation of the satellite and by ray-tracing techniques.…”
Section: Basics Of Srp Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For box-wing-type SRP models (Rodríguez-Solano, 2014a) the satellite is described by a small number of surfaces, while Ziebart (2004) established a more complex handling of SRP by finite element representation of the satellite and by ray-tracing techniques.…”
Section: Basics Of Srp Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANGARA is able to calculate both radiation pressure and aerodynamic force coefficients using the same tools for building the satellite geometry. Similar techniques and software implementations are described in Ziebart [2004] and Ziebart et al [2005] for radiation pressure effects and in Fuller and Tolson [2009] for aerodynamics. The modeled accelerations can then be calculated by evaluating the same analytical equations as for the simple panel models.…”
Section: Full 3d Models With Shadowing and Multiple Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main improvement of ECOM2 over ECOM1 is the introduction of even (2/rev) and (4/rev) periodic terms in the direction of direct solar radiation (Sun-Earth direction or D-axis of the ECOM decomposition). Like other modern SRP models, such as the ones introduced by Ziebart (2004), Ikari et al (2013), Rodriguez-Solano et al (2014), Springer et al (2014), , or , ECOM2 is able to take into account the variation of the direct solar radiation pressure within an orbit revolution caused by the variation of the illuminated cross-section of a rotating, elongated satellite body. The ECOM1, in contrast, assumes that the force in the direction of direct solar radiation (D-axis of the ECOM decomposition) is constant within an orbit arc, which would be true for spherical satellite bodies and is a good approximation for cubic satellite bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%