2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25129-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermospheric Density and Wind Determination from Satellite Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
212
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
4
212
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the empirical models are created by fitting a set of parametric equations to an underlying database of observations. The accuracy of the models is therefore dependent on both the strength of the database as well as the ability of the parametric equations to reproduce these data for interpolation and extrapolation (Doornbos 2012). The proposed method does not bear such limitations and can give acceptable results under various geophysical conditions if reliable Ne(h) profiles are used.…”
Section: Calculatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the empirical models are created by fitting a set of parametric equations to an underlying database of observations. The accuracy of the models is therefore dependent on both the strength of the database as well as the ability of the parametric equations to reproduce these data for interpolation and extrapolation (Doornbos 2012). The proposed method does not bear such limitations and can give acceptable results under various geophysical conditions if reliable Ne(h) profiles are used.…”
Section: Calculatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sutton (2009) shows an overestimation of the CHAMP density values of about 20 % when compared to the HASDM semiempirical model. Doornbos (2012) observed a similar overestimation when comparing the same semi-empirical model data with CHAMP densities processed with a different retrieval algorithm. Both Sutton (2009) and Doornbos (2012) conclude that the bias in the density values is caused by the approximations in the modelling of the external satellite geometry and the aerodynamic interaction of the gas with the spacecraft walls.…”
Section: Validation Datamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Doornbos (2012) observed a similar overestimation when comparing the same semi-empirical model data with CHAMP densities processed with a different retrieval algorithm. Both Sutton (2009) and Doornbos (2012) conclude that the bias in the density values is caused by the approximations in the modelling of the external satellite geometry and the aerodynamic interaction of the gas with the spacecraft walls. The design of the CHAMP satellite, with its complex elongated shape and protruding instruments, antennae and baffles, is not ideal for the purpose of density measurements.…”
Section: Validation Datamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Current drag and atmospheric models of satellites show deviations up to 20% from the actual behaviour (Doornbos 2011;Mehta et al 2013). This leads to satellite operators overestimating the fuel required, and to less accurate orbit predictions.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%