Generalization of minimax and maximin criteria in a game against nature for the case of a partial a priori uncertainty

Abstract

This study proposes a new criterion for choosing the optimal decision in a game against nature under a partial a priori uncertainty. The paper's main novelty consists in examining the situation when a part of the a priori probabilities of states of nature is known, and the other part is unknown. We prove the theorems for choosing the optimal decision as for the payoff and risk matrix, as well as for the profit matrix in the situation of a partial a priori uncertainty. The proposed approach also generalizes the Bayes, Wald, Savage, Hurwicz, and Laplace criteria since the minimum average payoff (or risk) for each of these criteria we can quickly obtain from the article's derived formulas. A practical example of a game against nature under a partial a priori uncertainty illustrates the proposed approach and shows its effectiveness compared to well-known criteria. We show that the introduced criterion provides the choice of a decision that is also optimal in conditions of risk, which indicates the effective use of the vector of known a priori probabilities.

Navigating the complexities of marketing decision-making in uncertain supply chains: A quantitative exploration

“…In such scenarios, making marketing decisions based on incomplete or ambiguous information can be challenging and may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Ulanskya and Razab (2021), explained uncertainty to be connected with a complete lack of information. Decision making under uncertainty can have a significant effect on marketing strategies.…”

Uncertainties Influencing Transportation System Performances

“…Ng (1) Ng (2) Ng (3) Ng (1) Ng (2) Ng ( The variant S4 (Np (2) > Np (1) ; Ng (1) > Ng (2) > Ng (3) ), with the highest costs for all k and j, is excluded from the analysis. Besides the highest costs, S4 leads to a large unuseful capacity Each of the four sequences must be analyzed for each of the six combinations of N g and N p (Figure 5).…”

“…The variant S 4 (N p (2) > N p (1) ; N g (1) > N g (2) > N g (3) ), with the highest costs for all k and j, is excluded from analysis. Besides the highest costs, S 4 leads to a large unuseful capacity increase until the time horizon T.…”

“…In case of rare events (natural disasters, political instability, etc. ), the analyst must postulate subjective probability laws, such as those introduced by Savage [2,3].…”

“…If the analyst has no information on the probabilities of the rare event occurrence, then min-max or max-min criteria are recommended [3,4].…”