Generalizability of scores influenced by multiple sources of variance

Gleser, Goldine C.; Cronbach, Lee J.; Rajaratnam, Nageswari

doi:10.1007/bf02289531

Cited by 138 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Up until that point it had been implicitly assumed that the various procedures were measuring a single underlying construct called "reliability". Generalizability Theory, however, recognizes the various sources of unreliability and attempts to measure them separately (Cronbach et al 1963, l972;l Gleser et al 1965).…”

Section: The Nature Of Conjoint Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Conjoint Analysis Reliability: Empirical Findings

1988

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper looks at the comparative reliability of different methodological variants of the conjoint analysis procedure. It differs from previous studies in that it looks at three methods of data collection (Full Profile, Trade-off Matrices, and Paired Comparison) and two levels of a key attribute (price) across five different product categories. In addition it tests these manipula-tions using two different reliability assessment procedures. The results show that most manipu-lations have a significant effect on the reliability scores and many interaction terms are significant. The Research paper is not to be copied or referred without the express permission if the authors. Comments welcome. The results show that all manipulations have a significant effect on the reliability scores and many interaction terms are significant.

show abstract

Section: The Nature Of Conjoint Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Conjoint Analysis Reliability: Empirical Findings

1988

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Chi-square was used because the nonindependence of the accounts, as well as other possible violations of assumptions underlying parametric statistical analyses, made a nonparametric approach advisable. Second, the categorizers' evaluations were analyzed over vignette, sphere, primary influence determinant, and categorizer to produce generalizability estimates (Gleser, Cronbach, & Rajaratnam, 1965). A repeated measure, multivariate analysis of variance was used to produce variance estimates for each contribution-vignette, sphere, primary influence determination, and categorizer.…”

Section: Figure 1 Interaction Of Values Orientation Spheres As Strangmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Nuances, Assumptions, and the Butterfly Effect: Addressing the Unpredictability Caused by Unconscious Values Structures in Cross‐Cultural Interactions

Remer

2007

Counseling and Values

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural values, cross-cultural interaction patterns that are produced by dynamical (chaotic) systems, have a significant impact on interaction, particularly among and between people from different cultures. The butterfly effect, which states that small differences in initial conditions may have severe consequences for patterns in the long run, serves as a creative way of drawing attention to a particularly challenging aspect of such chaotic systems. Forty-six accounts of cross-cultural situations involving the interface of Asian and Western cultures were examined for underlying nuances (using Kluckhohn values orientations; F. R. Kluckhohn & F. L. Strodtbeck, 1961) and their possible effects. The discrepant relational perspective contributed the most to interaction difficulties but was not independent of other spheres. It is the last day in Taipei, Taiwan, for a yearlong visitor. He has a plane to catch and much to do-packing, closing bank accounts, mailing belongings, leave takings. Having been invited for a last lunch by a colleague, he heads back to his office to drop off some gifts when his hostess catches him and frantically spirits him across the city. He arrives to find a large number of people just about ready to leave a luncheon, many of whom he does not know. He realizes they have been invited to see him off. He has erred. His hostess and friends have "lost face." Was this all his fault? Why? Hadn't he learned anything during his stay? Will they distrust foreigners in the future, thinking them rude? What will their attitude be toward Americans now? Will their friends attend such gatherings again? However, if he had been on time for the luncheon, he might have missed his plane later that day, and his apartment would have been a mess. What impression would that have left? Should he have known better, planned better?Recognizing that cultural values have a significant impact on interaction, particularly among and between people from different cultures, is nothing new (R.

show abstract

“…Messfehlerquellen ermöglicht die Generalisierbarkeitstheorie, die von Cronbach und seinen Mitarbeitern entwickelt wurde (Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda & Rajaratnam, 1972;Cronbach, Rajaratnam & Gleser, 1963;Gleser et al, 1965). Diese Theorie verzichtet auf die der klassischen Testtheorie eigenen Äquivalenzannahmen so genannter paralleler Tests, also der Annahme, dass Messungen gleiche Inhalte wiedergeben und gleiche Mittelwerte, Varianzen und Kovarianzen besitzen (Brennan, 1983, S. 120), so kann man den Erwartungswert der Korrelation von zwei Beobachtungswerten der Korrelation zwischen dem beobachteten Wert und dem 'universe score' gleichsetzen (Campbell, 1976).…”

Section: Eine Berücksichtigung Verschiedenartiger Untersuchungsobjektunclassified

Methodische Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Generalisierbarkeitstheorie in der betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung

Eisend¹

2007

WIST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.

show abstract

Generalizability of scores influenced by multiple sources of variance

Cited by 138 publications

References 11 publications

Conjoint Analysis Reliability: Empirical Findings

Conjoint Analysis Reliability: Empirical Findings

Cultural Nuances, Assumptions, and the Butterfly Effect: Addressing the Unpredictability Caused by Unconscious Values Structures in Cross‐Cultural Interactions

Methodische Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Generalisierbarkeitstheorie in der betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About