Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General scores for accessibility and inequality measures in urban areas

Abstract: In the last decades, the acceleration of urban growth has led to an unprecedented level of urban interactions and interdependence. This situation calls for a significant effort among the scientific community to come up with engaging and meaningful visualizations and accessible scenario simulation engines. The present paper gives a contribution in this direction by providing general methods to evaluate accessibility in cities based on public transportation data. Through the notion of isochrones, the accessibili… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Later in this section, we shall define a measure of efficiency focusing on the total travel time and the total number of trips. There are measures of transport or commuting efficiency defined in the literature addressing different aspects of the movements [20,[32][33][34][35][36]. The route factor and its generalizations compare the topological distances in the network with the geometrical distances [33,35].…”
Section: Now Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later in this section, we shall define a measure of efficiency focusing on the total travel time and the total number of trips. There are measures of transport or commuting efficiency defined in the literature addressing different aspects of the movements [20,[32][33][34][35][36]. The route factor and its generalizations compare the topological distances in the network with the geometrical distances [33,35].…”
Section: Now Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excess commuting index on the other hand concerns with distribution of home and work places and compares the actual commuting distances with a theoretical optimal one [32,34]. Finally, the accessibility of a city can be quantified by the velocity and sociability scores defined in [36]. Each of these measures focuses on some structural or dynamical properties of the network and the commuting process.…”
Section: Now Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the following two measures of mobility: weighted reach and furthest reachable point. Weighted reach or reachability is an accessibility measure (Levinson 2012;Biazzo et al 2018) that counts, for each hex node i, the number of other hexes j reachable from i, weighted by the inverse of the time to reach j:…”
Section: Network Flow and Urban Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although highly consistent, there are differences in traversal duration and availability across the day. Our current analysis is meant to be an aggregate flow across typically available transportation methods, but more refined data for Japan's train and bus systems could make an analysis that depends on the time of day possible (Ayed et al 2011;Cherdarchuk 2014;Idri et al 2017;Biazzo et al 2018).…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information is also available at all times of the day, avoiding the problems associated with the organization of meetings, opening up opportunities for more people to take part to a public consultation. Moreover, with a web-based system, the public is provided with access to interactive online planning documents can help the audience to focus on particular places, rather than wade through a long document to find the policies that may have implications for their lives [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%