General practitioners’ perceptions of their practice of evidence-based chronic disease prevention interventions: a quantitative study in Shanghai, China
Abstract:Background: Epidemic chronic diseases pose significant challenges to the improvement of healthcare in China and worldwide. Despite increasing international calls for the inclusion of evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) processes in chronic disease prevention and control programming as well as policymaking, there is relatively little research that assesses the current capacity of physicians and the factors that influence that capacity in China. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted in community hea… Show more
“…However, they did not appear to be confident in their abilities to implement them in practice ( Table 1 ). This may be linked to their perceived difficulty in locating appropriate resources, including Cochrane resources ( Table 2 ) and a lack of experience, which aligns with previous studies [ 7 , 8 , 10 , [12] , [13] , [14] ]. The findings suggest that healthcare providers and scholars require more support regarding the availability of evidence resources, including Cochrane resources, and in improving the competency of finding and using evidence resources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, many frontline clinicians have exhibited a positive attitude towards evidence-based healthcare and agree that its implementation is necessary in clinical environments [ [7] , [8] , [9] ]. However, previous studies have also suggested that clinicians in China possess a low to moderate level of evidence-based practice competency [ 7 , [10] , [11] , [12] ], as well as limited experience in applying new knowledge and practicing knowledge translation [ 8 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Objectives
Evidence-based healthcare contributes to the improvement of healthcare quality and informs healthcare decision-making. The provision of timely high-quality evidence is always required to fulfil the ever-changing needs and expectations of healthcare personnel. This study aimed to assess the needs and expectations of healthcare personnel regarding evidence-based healthcare in China.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional online survey from December 8, 2020 to January 15, 2021 involving 901 participants across China. Healthcare providers, policy makers, researchers and educators, and full-time postgraduate medical and nursing students working/living in China were eligible to participate. A self-developed questionnaire was used.
Results
Participants generally agreed that health-related research evidence was beneficial. Evidence-based resources, such as Cochrane resources, were only known or used by about half of the respondents due to difficulties related to availability and accessibility. Various types of resources, topics of evidence, and themes of workshops were of particular interest to most of the participants.
Conclusions
The dissemination and translation of evidence, provision of more support in evidence availability, offering evidence-based training, and determining the most in-demand research areas have been identified as priority areas of work which could fulfil the needs and expectations of healthcare personnel in China.
“…However, they did not appear to be confident in their abilities to implement them in practice ( Table 1 ). This may be linked to their perceived difficulty in locating appropriate resources, including Cochrane resources ( Table 2 ) and a lack of experience, which aligns with previous studies [ 7 , 8 , 10 , [12] , [13] , [14] ]. The findings suggest that healthcare providers and scholars require more support regarding the availability of evidence resources, including Cochrane resources, and in improving the competency of finding and using evidence resources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, many frontline clinicians have exhibited a positive attitude towards evidence-based healthcare and agree that its implementation is necessary in clinical environments [ [7] , [8] , [9] ]. However, previous studies have also suggested that clinicians in China possess a low to moderate level of evidence-based practice competency [ 7 , [10] , [11] , [12] ], as well as limited experience in applying new knowledge and practicing knowledge translation [ 8 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Objectives
Evidence-based healthcare contributes to the improvement of healthcare quality and informs healthcare decision-making. The provision of timely high-quality evidence is always required to fulfil the ever-changing needs and expectations of healthcare personnel. This study aimed to assess the needs and expectations of healthcare personnel regarding evidence-based healthcare in China.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional online survey from December 8, 2020 to January 15, 2021 involving 901 participants across China. Healthcare providers, policy makers, researchers and educators, and full-time postgraduate medical and nursing students working/living in China were eligible to participate. A self-developed questionnaire was used.
Results
Participants generally agreed that health-related research evidence was beneficial. Evidence-based resources, such as Cochrane resources, were only known or used by about half of the respondents due to difficulties related to availability and accessibility. Various types of resources, topics of evidence, and themes of workshops were of particular interest to most of the participants.
Conclusions
The dissemination and translation of evidence, provision of more support in evidence availability, offering evidence-based training, and determining the most in-demand research areas have been identified as priority areas of work which could fulfil the needs and expectations of healthcare personnel in China.
“…The questionnaire was adapted from a study comparing the use of EBCDP processes ( 17 , 18 ). At the beginning of the questionnaire, we explained the purpose of the questionnaire and relevant concepts to the respondents (EBCDP, evidence-based programs, etc.).…”
BackgroundThe implementation of evidence-based approaches by general practitioners (GPs) is new in the primary care setting, and few quantitative studies have evaluated the impact of contextual factors on the attendance of these approaches.MethodsIn total, 892 GPs from 75 community healthcare centers (CHCs) in Shanghai completed our survey. We used logistic regression to analyze factors affecting the number of evidence-based chronic disease programs attended by GPs and whether they had held the lead position in such a program.ResultsA total of 346 (38.8%) of the practitioners had never participated in any evidence-based chronic disease prevention (EBCDP) program. The EBCDP interventions in which the GPs had participated were predominantly related to hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. However, the proportion of GPs in the lead role was relatively low, between 0.8% (programs involving prevention and control of asthma) and 5.0% (diabetes). Organizational factors and areas were significantly associated with evidence-based practices (EBPs) of the GP, while monthly income and department were the most significantly related to GPs who have the lead role in a program. The results indicated that GPs who had taken the lead position had higher scores for policy and economic impeding factors. GPs who were men, had a higher income, and worked in prevention and healthcare departments and urban areas were more likely to take the lead position.ConclusionEvidence-based programs for chronic diseases should be extended to different types of diseases. Personal, organizational, political, and economic factors and the factors of female sex, lower income, department type, and suburban area environment should be considered to facilitate the translation of evidence to practice.
“…Thus, controlling and preventing chronic diseases have become the main focus of health systems [ 10 ]. To achieve the best possible outcomes, evidence-based chronic disease prevention (EBCDP) emerged as a new approach to developing evidence-based programs to ensure that healthcare providers have access to up-to-date scientific evidence regarding chronic diseases [ 11 ]. Despite all efforts, there is a gap between knowledge generation and evidence implementation due to the inability of clinicians to search for and evaluate evidence [ 12 ].…”
Among the technology-based solutions, clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the ability to keep up with clinicians with the latest evidence in a smart way. Hence, the main objective of our study was to investigate the applicability and characteristics of CDSSs regarding chronic disease. The Web of Science, Scopus, OVID, and PubMed databases were searched using keywords from January 2000 to February 2023. The review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Then, an analysis was done to determine the characteristics and applicability of CDSSs. The quality of the appraisal was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool checklist (MMAT). A systematic database search yielded 206 citations. Eventually, 38 articles from sixteen countries met the inclusion criteria and were accepted for final analysis. The main approaches of all studies can be classified into adherence to evidence-based medicine (84.2%), early and accurate diagnosis (81.6%), identifying high-risk patients (50%), preventing medical errors (47.4%), providing up-to-date information to healthcare providers (36.8%), providing patient care remotely (21.1%), and standardizing care (71.1%). The most common features among the knowledge-based CDSSs included providing guidance and advice for physicians (92.11%), generating patient-specific recommendations (84.21%), integrating into electronic medical records (60.53%), and using alerts or reminders (60.53%). Among thirteen different methods to translate the knowledge of evidence into machine-interpretable knowledge, 34.21% of studies utilized the rule-based logic technique while 26.32% of studies used rule-based decision tree modeling. For CDSS development and translating knowledge, diverse methods and techniques were applied. Therefore, the development of a standard framework for the development of knowledge-based decision support systems should be considered by informaticians.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.